Chapter II  STRENGTHENING THE EXISTING STUDY PROGRAM
	ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING STUDY PROGRAM	  

Chapter 2.1  ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING STUDY PROGRAM

A.	BACKGROUND
After it moved to the new campus with all new facilities in 1985, the Electrical Engineering Study Program of Hasanuddin University, Makassar (occasionally in this Chapter is referred to as "the Study Program") stated its vision and mission as follows:

The Study Program’s VISION is to be the Center of Development and Implementation of the Electrical Engineering Technology and to become a leading engineering education institution in the country. Its MISSION is to graduate professionals who are able to advance their own technical skills and knowledge, and to adopt the development of technology.

The mission was carried out very well especially when a 10-year-long project called the Engineering Acceleration Project (Proyek Percepatan Insinyur, PPI) was launched in 1986. However; since the project ended in 1996, the Study Program has been constantly suffering from the quality degradation. The vision has become so blurring and the mission is so impossible; so only its long history, the high quality it used to have and the perseverance of all staffs that have helped maintaining the Study Program's performance up to a certain level. Without a careful rescue plan, the Self-Evaluation Report has shown that the performance will not last long in the future.
	As has been concluded from the SWOT and Force-Field Analysis in Revised-Self Evaluation Report (SER) Chapter III.B.1. (see page III.B.1-1 to III.B.1-4 of the Revised Sub-Project Proposal), there are 3 (three) major obstacles - among others - that are supposed to be controllable factors of  improving the quality of the Study Program, i.e.: 
•	The obsolescence of the laboratory equipment and laboratory course materials for advance laboratory courses,
•	Inadequate quantity of the laboratory equipment and laboratory course materials for basic laboratory courses, and 
•	The problem of teaching staff composition and qualification.
Those 3 (three) main issues above are the core of problems the Study Program is facing, and have been translated into strategic issues to develop several proposed activities (see Strategic Issues in Chapter III.B.2 Revised Inception Plan on page III.B.2-1 of the Revised Sub-Project Proposal) that will be detailed in the following Chapter 2.2. IMPROVING RAISE++ .
  
B.	THE STRATEGY AND THE OBJECTIVES
All the staff's high motivation to work together is the primary asset the Study Program has. This has been shown by the staff's response to the announcement of this project (see Appendix III.2 on page III-Ap-3 of the Revised Sub-Project Proposal). At all socialization events mentioned, 90% of the staff were in attendance. Even in the very early stage of the Self-Evaluation Report preparation for the TPSDP Batch 1, the process has reflected the firm commitment to come together. This should be carried on to the next stage, i.e. the preparation of this Sub-Project Proposal of the TPSDP Batch 2 and - if the project is granted - to the implementation of the project. The main strategy is to harvest the participation of all components to produce a list of activities - not a "list of wants" or a "procurement list" - as early as possible. For instance, on the issues regarding the laboratories, each laboratory was asked to start by preparing the list of experiments for laboratory courses, then based on each experiment, a list of equipment required was developed (see Appendix II.H.I to IV on page II-Ap-11 to 20 of the Revised Sub-Project Proposal for details). No equipment procurement is supposed to be proposed by any laboratory without a proposed experiment for a laboratory course. 

Implementation Plan

R

A

I

S

E

+

+

Performance Targets

Proposed Budget

PROJECT BENEFIT 
and ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

SE-REPORT
SWOT

Force-Field
Analysis

R.1.

R.2.

R.3.

R.4.

R.5.

A.1.

A.2.

E.1.

E.2.

AE

IMO

PROPOSED ACTIVITIES

STRATEGIC
ISSUES

Figure II-1 Line of Thought of the Preparation of the Sub-Project Proposal

 

	

Figure II-1 shows the line of thought in preparing this Sub-Project Proposal. After a long series of discussions on the results of the self-evaluation process, including the discussions with the TPSDP reviewers during the site-visit and negotiations, the Study Program came up with 11 (eleven) proposed activities:
•	To improve relevance: 5 (five) activities
•	To improve academic atmosphere: 2 (two) activities
•	To improve efficiency and productivity: 2 (two) activities
•	To improve access and equity: 1 (one) activity
•	To improve internal management and organization: 1 (one) activity
[Note: In the previous documents of this Sub-Project, one may notice that there used to be 4 (four) activities to improve relevance and 3 (three) activities to improve efficiency and productivity. After a long and intensive discussion, it was decided to change the main aspect of the activity of improving the staff qualification (activity E.3.) from improving the efficiency and productivity to improving the relevance].
C. PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
The general outcome of those eleven proposed activities will be quality improvements that are indicated by performance targets as shown in Table II-1. The increase of average NEM, for instance, is believed to be influenced mainly by improving access and equity as well as the quality enhancement as the consequences of the implementation of other activities. Hence, this indicator is omitted. 

Table II-1 Main Indicators for performance targets presented in their frequency ranges
Indicator	Baseline	As 31 Oct 2004	Midterm	Final	
	(%)	
GPA	
Percentage of graduates with GPA > 3.0	40.79	73.89	46.50	50.00	
Percentage of graduates with GPA between 2.5 and 3.0	56.35	22.93	52.50	49.50	
Percentage of graduates with GPA < 2.5	2.86	3.18	1.00	0.50	
TOEFL SCORE	
Percentage of students with TOEFL score > 500	5.53	6.49	16.60	37.80	
Percentage of students with  TOEFL score between 400 and 500	38.13	77.92	54.80	57.20	
Percentage of students with TOEFL score < 400	56.34	15.58	28.60	5.00	
LENGTH OF STUDY	
Percentage of graduates with length of study > 5 years	77.64	33.76	50.80	19.00	
Percentage of graduates with length of study  between 4.5 and 5 years	19.14	43.31	30.00	35.50	
Percentage of graduates with length of study < 4.5  years	3.22	22.93	19.20	45.50	
WAITING TIME FOR THE FIRST JOB	
Percentage of graduates who waited for their first jobs within 6 months	13.60	N/A	25.00	50.00	
Percentage of graduates who waited for their first jobs within 6 to 11 months	51.20	N/A	45.00	40.00	
Percentage of graduates who waited for their first jobs for more than 11 months	35.20	N/A	30.00	10.00	
FIRST JOB MONTHLY SALARY	
Percentage of graduates whose first job monthly salary > Rp. 1.2 millions	7.20	N/A	45.00	70.00	
Percentage of graduates whose first job monthly salary between Rp. 0.6 and 1.2 millions	50.40	N/A	35.00	20.00	
Percentage of graduates whose first job monthly salary < Rp. 0.6 millions	42.40	N/A	20.00	10.00	

Activities to improve efficiency and productivity will be directly and indirectly indicated by the increase of the graduates’ average GPA. These activities are also supposed to shorten the length of study as indicated by the average length of study. The average TOEFL scores, the graduates’ waiting time before getting the first job and the first job salary will indicate the improvement in relevance.
All proposed activities in this project are generally planned to boost most of the performance target indicators to yield a better result. Previously the performance targets were presented by the average values of the main indicators as suggested by the Guidelines. But, the incremental increase of the performance indicators have seemed “too modest” in comparison to the amount of capital invested in this project, and the average values may not really represent the actual condition. With a large student population, the presentation of the main indicators of the performance target in their frequency ranges or distribution – as presented in Table II-1 on page II-3 - will give a better perspective.
 The average of NEM score's baseline data is 47.1 with standard of deviation 6.0. Improving the relevance (R) of the educational process to the job-market and industrial needs can increase the NEM scores of the admitted students. Naturally, when the relevance (R) is improving, the number of applicants to the Study Program will increase, resulting tougher competition at the new student admittance. A larger number of new students with high NEM scores will be admitted, and this will affect the academic atmosphere (A) at the Study Program. Another way of achieving this target is by creating some campaign programs about the Study Program to the High Schools at the surrounding area.
The average of graduates' GPA taken from the last 4 (four) academic years is 2.94, distributed as shown in Table II-1. It is targeted to improve the distribution. This performance target indicates the improvement of the academic atmosphere (A) (e.g. by upgrading teaching facilities and classroom-facilities, developing lecturers' teaching skills and students' learning skills and creating competitiveness among students). 
Encouraging students to read more reference books in English and urging lecturers to use English in their classes - among others - will help to improve students' English proficiency indicated by their TOEFL scores. This is a part of activities that will improve the relevance (R) of the Study Program. At the beginning of the project, the average of TOEFL scores of students whose credit earnings are 120 sks or more is 403, this is fairly high, considering that the students did not make any preparation due to the very short notice before the test. The distribution of the TOEFL scores is targeted to be improved by the implementation of a special program proposed as one of the student co-curricular activities (see Activity R.4.1 on page II-11).
The average graduates' length of study is 5.67 years at the beginning of the project. This can be shortened at the end of project, and the distribution is expected to be better, by improving the efficiency and productivity (E) of the educational process.  This target can be achieved by improving the teaching and learning process (see Activity E.1. on page II-16) and to create more effective laboratory scheduling. In fact, the length of study has 2 (two) components, i.e. the classroom-courses study time and the final undergraduate project (skripsi) time. In order reduce the latter, the intensive interaction between supervisors and students should be enforced and the adequate laboratory equipment should be available. The baseline data of standard deviation can be reduced by continuous academic advisors' supervising on their students' study program planning and monitoring in order to detect the weak students. Special attention must be given to this kind of students to push them to study harder. Another factor that could influence the length of study time was the student academic leaves, which in most cases were caused by the lack of funding. Students' involvement in research and teaching grant activities are expected to be one of the possible remedies to reduce student academic leaves. An aggressive program to collect student scholarships (e.g. from alumni, industry, local and regional government) should be planned to help this problem out. 
Survey and direct interviews have shown that the waiting time to get the first job is 11 months in average, which is a rather long time. This indicator is influenced heavily by the unemployment rate in the market, which is closely related to the country economic situation. Assuming a better economic growth, then additional efforts to improve the students' English proficiency and computer skills, as well as continuous adjustments of the curriculum toward industrial world orientation, will give the graduates a strong penetration to the job market.  This will automatically reduce the waiting time to the first job. It is expected that the waiting time to get the first job will be reduced and the distribution will look better also at the end of the project.

Table II-2.  Additional indicators for performance targets
Indicator	Baseline	As 31 Oct 2004	Midterm	Final	
Ratio between applicants and admissions 	9.3%	6.8%	9%	8%	
Average duration of completing skripsi	9 months	6 months	 8 months	6 months	
Average active students with GPA less than 2.5  	4.8%	0%	4.6%	4.3%	
Average drop out students  	1.66%	0.16 %	1.60%	1.50%	
Productivity (Graduates/Population) 	11.08%	29%	15.5%	17%	
Average teachers attendance at classroom	85%	93%	87%	90%	

The factors that have affected the graduates' first job salary, such as the national and local economic growth, were beyond the Study Program's scope of control, but improving the relevance (R) of the Study Program in many ways will give the competitive advantages to the graduates so that they could ask for a higher salary on their first jobs.
The Study Program was accredited C in 1998, and only recently it was up-graded to B. It is strongly believed that if all activities are implemented in the TPSDP according to the proposed plans, the Study Program will be accredited A. 
Additional indicators as presented in Table II-2 are thought to be the direct impact of all proposed activities as described in details in the following Chapter 2.2. IMPROVING RAISE++. In addition to that, each proposed activity has its own performance indicators also. 

Chapter 2.2. IMPROVING RAISE++

1. Relevance
Code	Name of Activity	
R.1.	Improving, updating and renewing the quality of the modules, materials and delivery of the advance laboratory courses: Laboratory III and Laboratory IV (including the improvement of the qualifications of the Laboratory Assistants).	
R.2.	Enhancing the industrial relation in the surrounding area:	
	R.2.1.	Developing Apprenticeship Programs in Industry	
	R.2.2.	Developing Curriculum and Syllabus with a close cooperation with Industry	
	R.2.3.	Developing Industrial Training and Studies Programs	
R.3.	Developing NEW Classroom/Laboratory Teaching Materials:	
	R.3.1.	Cellular Telecommunication	
	R.3.2.	CISCO Certified Network Associate Training Center Development	
R.4.	Enhancing Students’ Co-Curricular Activities and Additional Skills and Competencies:	
	R.4.1.	English Competency: Technical and Engineering Writing Skills	
	R.4.2.	Computer and Internet Skills	
	R.4.3.	Student Electrical Workshop	
	R.4.4.	Students’ Personality Enhancement and Entrepreneurship Training Programs	
R.5.	Improving the Teaching Staff’s academic qualifications and the  Administrative Staff’s competency and skills:	
	R.5.1.	Domestic and Overseas Degree Programs S2, S3		
	R.5.2.	Local Vocational Trainings for Administrative Staffs and Laboratory Technicians		
	R.5.3.	International Conferences and Domestic Special Non-Degree Programs	

1.1. Name of Activity: R.1. Improving, updating and renewing the quality of the modules, materials and delivery of the advance laboratory courses: Laboratory III and Laboratory IV (including the improvement of the Laboratory Assistants qualifications). 	
Background: The structure of curriculum requires advance laboratory courses Laboratory III and Laboratory IV to be taken at the fifth and the sixth semester by the students of different Sub-Study Programs in different 11 (eleven) laboratories. These two laboratory courses are designed to support the core and advance courses provided by each Sub-Study Program (see Chapter III.1.B. Section 11 Curriculum on page III.B.1-16 of the Revised Sub-Project Proposal). There has been no serious updating of both laboratory teaching materials and laboratory equipment since 15 years ago when the Study Program moved from the old campus. The obsolescence of both the teaching materials and the equipment is apparent, which makes the laboratory courses irrelevant to the rapid progress of electrical engineering technology as well as the demand of the job-market. Lack of sufficient funding to maintain and update old equipment has made most laboratory equipment and instruments are not functioning appropriately as they are supposed to be. So far, program study has been renewed several experimental modules and it has used by students in laboratory course. 	
To be continued in the next page ……	
Activity R.1. (continued)	
Rationale: Upgrading, repairing and updating laboratory teaching materials in accordance with the rapid progress of electrical engineering technology will improve the competitiveness of the graduates  These activities are necessary in order to develop the graduates’ technological and professional skills which are closely related to the job-market demand. 	
Objective : The improvement of the graduates’ competitiveness in the job-market.	
Mechanism and design :
R.1.1. Assessing the existing laboratories condition, mainly in terms of organizational and management aspects, environmental and utilities setting, and the quality of laboratory course materials. 
R.1.2. Preparing the standard workplace and required utilities in the laboratories.
R.1.3. Repairing and renewing the existing experiment modules, instruments and parts. 
R.1.4. Commissioning test of the new laboratory equipment.
R.1.5. Developing experiment guides and related laboratory assistant training materials.
R.1.6. Implementing and evaluating the updated experiment modules for Laboratory III and IV courses	
Resources required:  	
Sub-activity	Cost Components	Rp	US $	Source of Funding	
R.1.1.	Program Development	0,00		TPSDP	DRK	
R.1.2.	Furniture	21.650.800,00		TPSDP  		
	Civil Works	62.235.872,40		TPSDP  	DRK	
R.1.3.	Equipment 	14.025.000,00	63.051,10	TPSDP  		
R.1.4.						
R.1.5.	Program Development	0,00		TPSDP  		
	Total	97.911.672,40	63.051,10		
Implementation Schedule (By Quarter):	
Sub-activity	Yr 1	Yr 2	Yr 3	Yr 4	
R.1.1.				
Re-scheduled, waiting for the delivery of the laboratory equipment

R.1.2.																	
R.1.3.																	
R.1.4.																	
R.1.5.																	
R.1.6.																	
Performance indicators of Activity :	
Indicators	Baseline	Mid	Status	Final	
Repaired, updated and renewed experiment modules and test instruments	0%	50%	25-50%	100%	
Percentage of graduates working in their related fields 	N/A	40%	N/A	60%	
Sustainability : The sustainability of this activity will be guaranteed by establishing:
1.	Routine maintenance and repair works by laboratory assistants and technicians who acquire the skills from appropriate training programs.
2.	Practical training programs for technical high school and/or D-3/Polytechnic students in laboratory routine maintenance and repair works.
3.	Cooperation with private universities in surrounding area for laboratory assistant training programs 
4.	Collaboration with industry in joint-research programs.	
Person in charge: Ir. Hj. Nien K. Nauman	

1.2. Name of Activity: R.2. Enhancing the industrial relation in the surrounding area.
Background: 
1.	The Study Program has a very limited collaboration with local companies and industries yielding no solid linkage with the surrounding environment
2.	Job-market in most industries requires industrial experience in the recruitment of fresh graduates
3.	There is an indication that a number of alumni were fired from work right after their probation
4.	Many fresh graduates were not sufficiently confident to enter the job-market due to their very low experience in industrial world 	
Rationale :
1.	The apprenticeship program designed in this activity will enhance the industrial relation of the Study Program that will be expanded into close collaboration with industry in curriculum development, training and studies.
2.	This activity will provide the students and the fresh graduates some industrial certifications that will be useful for entering the job-market
3.	This activity will improve the fresh graduates’ self confidence in entering the job-market
4.	Closer relation with industry will give a better shape of the curriculum design and course syllabi in terms of the industrial relevance.     	
Objective : The establishment of a strong industrial apprenticeship program in order to strengthen the industrial relation of the Study Program and to enhance relevance in terms of industrial relation 	
Mechanism and design :
•	R.2.1. Developing Apprenticeship Programs in Industry
•	R.2.2. Developing Curriculum and Syllabus with a close industrial cooperation 
•	R.2.3. Developing Industrial Training and Studies Programs	
Resources required :	
Sub-activity	Cost Components 	Rp.	Funding Source 	
R.2.1.	Program Development	9.230.769,24	TPSDP  	DRK 	
R.2.2.	Program Development	13.153.846,50	TPSDP	DRK	
R.2.3.	Program Development	3.333.333,33	TPSDP	DRK	
	TOTAL	25.717.949,07	TPSDP	DRK	
Implementation Schedule (By Quarter):	
Sub-activities	
Re-scheduled

Yr 1	Yr 2	Yr 3	Yr 4	
R.2.1																	
R.2.2																	
R.2.3																	
Performance indicators of Activity :	
Indicators	Baseline	Mid	Status	Final	
Percentage of alumni participating in the industrial apprenticeship program every graduation	0%	5%	N/A	10%	
Number of implemented Memorandum of Agreements (MOUs) on curriculum development with industries	N/A	4	1	10	
Graduates’ waiting time before getting  the first job	11 months	9 months	N/A	5 months	
First job salary (in Rupiahs)	Rp.712.400	Rp.1.000.000	N/A	Rp.1.500.000	
To be continued in the next page ……

Activity R.2. (continued)	
Sustainability : To continue with this apprenticeship program and the industrial relation after the final year of the project term, the following efforts could be done:
1.	Each participant is asked to contribute for this program
2.	Alumni Association could adopt this program 
If the industrial world can be convinced that this program is beneficial, the collaboration with the industrial world will continue. 	
Person in charge: Ir. A. Toyib Rahardjo, M.Sc.	

1.3. Name of Activity: R.3. Developing NEW Classroom/Laboratory Teaching Materials
Background: Due to the lack of adequate courses materials, laboratory equipment, access of  information and advance technology skills; the alumni seem to lose the self-confidence, especially when they have to penetrate job market.	
Rationale: With this activity, it is expected that the alumni will have more ability and knowledge to compete with others to get their jobs.	
Objective: The activity proposed below will provide an opportunity for the lecturers and students to keep up with the current technological development. The alumni will have some opportunity to get world wide accepted certificates.  	
Mechanism and design:	
R.3.1. Improving the knowledge and skills of staff and student in the progress of cellular technology development:	
	R.3.1.1: Improving the staff and students’ practical skills and knowledge through a related industrial apprenticeship program	
	R.3.1.2: Preparing the required hardware and software, including instructional materials and experimental guides.	
	R.3.1.3: Providing a competitive Teaching Grant for developing related laboratory course materials	
	R.3.1.4: Implementing the laboratory course on cellular technology	
R.3.2.  Acquiring the CISCO Certified Network Associates (CCNA): 	
	R.3.2.1: Instructors in-country training for CCNA. Candidates will be sent to an in-country CCNA Centre to participate in a two-month training program to obtain the Certificate of Instructor.	
	R.3.2.2: Preparing the required hardware, software and Internet link necessary to establish the center.	
	R 3.2.3:  Developing the instructional materials for the training program 	
	R.3.2.4:  Conducting the Local Assistants Training	
	R.3.2.5:  Implementing the regular training programs	
	R.3.2.6:  Conducting the standard tests for certification   	
Resource Required:  	
Activity	Sub-Activity	Cost Component	Rp.	US$	Funding Source	
R 3.1	R 3.1.1	Program Dev.	At cost		R.2.1	
	R 3.1.2	Equipment		21,230.00	TPSDP	
	R 3.1.3	Teaching Grant	20.000.000,00		TPSDP	
R.3.2.	R 3.2.1  	Staff Dev.	 27.500.000,00		TPSDP + DRK	
	R 3.2.2	Equipment		0.00	TPSDP	
Total Cost	47.500.000,00	21,230.00		

To be continued in the next page ……

h

Activity R.3. (continued)	
Implementation Schedule (By Quarter):	
Activity	Sub-Activity	Yr 1	Yr 2	Yr 3	Yr 4	
R 3.1	R 3.1.1																	
	R 3.1.2																	
	R 3.1.3																	
	R.3.1.4																	
R.3.2.	R 3.2.1																	
	R 3.2.2																	
	R 3.2.3																	
	R 3.2.4																	
	R.3.2.5																	
	R 3.2.6																	
Performance indicators of Activity:	
Activity	Indicators	Baseline	Mid	Status	Final	
R 3.1.	Number of Apprenticeship participants
a. Staff
b. Student					
		0	2 	1	5 persons	
		0	8 	4	16 persons	
	Number of graduates working in cellular technology	N/A	1 	N/A	5 persons	
R 3.2.	Number of CCNA Instructors	0	2 	0	2 persons	
	Number of CCNA certified associates	0	20 	0	80 persons	
Sustainability: In the future, these activities will become sources of revenue for the Study Program. Local private universities and industries, as well as students and alumni, are expected to participate in the local training, to use the laboratories and to obtain the International Certification through these programs.	
Person in charge : Dr.Ir.H.Rhiza S. Sadjad, MSEE	

1.4. Name of Activity: R.4. Enhancing Students’ Co-Curricular Activities and Additional Skills and Competencies
Background: A plan to enhance the student additional skills and competence should be proposed to improve the students' English competency, vocational, computer and internet skills. The establishment of student workshop facilities is also a part of this plan. From the polling (see the analysis at the end of Section 2 Environmental Setting, page III.B.1-8 and appendix III.10, page III-Ap-9 of the Revised Sub-Project Proposal) only about little bit more than 10 % of the students intended to work as entrepreneurs (8,71 %) or freelance workers (2,70 %) after they graduated. Regular programs/activities should be proposed to enhance the students' personality entrepreneurship as another part of the plan. Up to now, several activities for example freshtech workshop funded under TPSDP project have been successfully undertaken during the last two years and improved significantly the computer skills of the students. This program has been adopted by the study program and will be continuously implemented as annual student activities. Based on this fact, the study program would establish other training programs for year III intended for student’ co-curricular activities.                	
Rationale: These programs/activities will assist students to improve their skills in English, computer, internet, vocational, entrepreneurship, and self-personality.	
Objective: To produce graduates mastering English, computer, Internet, vocational, entrepreneurship, and self-personality that will enable them to compete in the job market.	
To be continued in the next page ……
Activity R.4. (continued)	
Mechanism and design :
•	R.4.1. Developing regular programs/activities to improve the Students’ English Technical Writing and Conversational Skills. This program will be carried out through the improvement of staff capacity to manage such skill. A workshop will be performed where all staff and final year students will participate. 
•	R.4.2. Developing regular training programs/activities  to improve the Students’ Computer and Internet Skills
•	R.4.3. Establishing the Student Electrical and Electronic Workshop to improve the students’ vocational skills.
•	R.4.4. Developing regular programs/activities to enhance Students’ Personality and Entrepreneurship 	
Resources required :	
Activity	Cost Components 	Rp.	Funding Source 	
R.4.1.	Program Development	2.085.714,00	TPSDP + DRK	
R.4.2.	Program Development	 10.000.000,00	TPSDP + DRK	
R.4.3.	Equipment	0,00	TPSDP	
	Instructional Material	  0,00	TPSDP	
R.4.4.	Program Development	6.837.142,86	TPSDP + DRK	
	TOTAL:	18,922,856.86	TPSDP	
Implementation Schedule (By Quarter):	
 Sub-Activity	Yr 1	Yr 2	Yr 3	Yr 4	
R.4.1.(Developt.)																	
R.4.1.(Implemt.)					
Partly 
re-scheduled

R.4.2.(Developt.)																	
R.4.2.(Implemt.)																	
R.4.3.																	
R.4.4.(Developt.)																	
R.4.4.(Implemt.)																	
Performance indicators of Activity :	
No.	Indicators	Baseline	Mid	Status	Final	
1	TOEFL Score (average)	403	450	426	500	
2	Percentage Internet users among students	no data	50%	60%	95%	
3	Participation in the National Technical and Scientific Contests/Competition	0	every other year	every year	every year	
4	Percentage of students who are motivated to become entrepreneurs after graduations	< 10%	30%	15%	40%	
Sustainability : All activities would be a regular student activities, and expected to generate revenues to support the continuity of student extra-curricular activities.	
Person in charge: Faizal A. Samman, ST, MT.	

1.5. Name of Activity: R.5. Improving the Teaching Staff’s academic qualifications and the Administrative Staff’s/Laboratory Technicians’ competency and skills
Background: 32.61% of the Study Program’s teaching staff are above 50 years old, 84.78% are alumni, only 4 (four) Ph.D.’s and only 2 (two) of those four Ph.D.'s are Professors. Teaching loads are very high due to the student-to-lecturer ratio, which is about 36.7. The composition and the qualifications of the teaching staffs do not support efficient and productive teaching and learning process. More importantly, most of the lecturers did not have any academic experiences other than their own college experience many years back. Consequently, all teaching materials and methods delivered by those lecturers are irrelevant to the progress of the electrical engineering technology.   	
To be continued in the next page ……
	
Activity R.5. (continued)	
Rationale: This activity will include both degree training and non-degree training programs, both domestic and overseas, for the teaching staff as well as for the administrative staff and laboratory technicians. Hence, this activity will be directly beneficial to the teaching and learning process – both classroom and laboratory courses – due to the improvement of the staff qualification, competency and skills.	
Objective: Increasing the number of Master’s and Ph.D.-degree holders to make up the composition and the qualifications of the staff. In addition to the degree-program, the non-degree programs will provide a new academic experience for the staff that will surely enrich their teaching materials and methods. Non-degree programs for administrative staff and laboratory technicians will up-grade their skills and knowledge, so it will certainly improve their services to the study program.	
Mechanism and design:
•	R.5.1. Improving the staffs’ academic qualification by attending degree-programs both overseas and domestic.
•	R.5.2. Improving the administrative staffs’ and laboratory technicians’ knowledge and skills by attending local vocational training programs.	
•	R.5.3. Enlarging the staffs’ academic perspectives by attending international conferences and special domestic non-degree programs.			
Resources required: 	
Activity	Cost Components 	Rp.	US $	Funding  Source 	
R.5.1.	Staff Development	181.600.000,00	416,500.00	TPSDP  	
R.5.2.	Staff Development	18.000.000,00		TPSDP	
R.5.3.	Staff Development	52.350.000,00	4,800.00	TPSDP	
	TOTAL:	251.950.000,00	421,300.00		
Implementation Schedule (By Quarter):	
Activity	Yr 1	Yr 2	Yr 3	Yr 4	
R.5.1.	S3 (overseas)		5														0	
	S3 (domestic)		2	
Mostly Implemented

													0	
	S2 (overseas)						1								0			
	S2 (domestic)		1								0							
R.5.2.	Loc. Voc. Training	
Re-scheduled, waiting for the lab.equipment delivery

R.5.3.	Int’l Seminar/Tra.	1		
Partly Implemented

		1				2								
	Dom.Non-Deg.																	
Performance indicators of Activity	
Indicators	Baseline	Mid	Status	Final	
Number of Ph.D. (S-3 Degrees) holders	4	5	6	8	
Number of Masters Degree holders	16	25	35	35	
Number of papers published in Int’l Journal 	0	1	0	4	
Number of self-repaired laboratory equipment	0%	25%	25-50%	70%	
Service-time at the Department Office (e.g. the process of issuing academic transcripts) 	1 day		N/A	5 min.	
Sustainability : Staff Development is always a long term investment that will last. 	
Person in charge: Prof.DR.Ir.Muh.Tola, M.Eng	

2. Academic Atmosphere
Code	Name of Activity	
A.1.
	Special Events, Meetings and Dialogues:	
	A.1.1.	Improving teaching methods by providing Teaching Grants 	
	A.1.2.	Improving the students’ research (skripsi) qualities by providing Student Grants 	
	A.1.3.	Improving the staffs’ research qualities by providing Research Grants 	
	A.1.4.	Developing a teaching and learning process evaluation system involving students	
	A.1.5.	Developing the staffs’ advising abilities by providing a Guidance and Counseling Training program.	
	A.1.6.	Academic Dialogue and other special events involving all staffs and students. 	
	A.1.7.	Academic Meetings.	
A.2.	Enhancing student's learning skills and reading habits	

2.1. Name of Activity: A.1. Special Events, Meetings and Dialogues
Background: The relation among students, lecturers and staff is an essential factor of academic atmosphere. Due to heavy loads and tight class schedule, the interaction between students and lecturers is generally very limited, except in the supervision of the skripsi. The relation between the Electrical Engineering Student Association (HME) and the academic staff does not seem as having created a conducive environment to build a high-quality teaching-learning process.	
Rationale: Regular academic meetings between academic staff and students will enhance the relationship among all components of the Study Program. Developing staffs' abilities in advising students, i.e. by equipping the staffs with guidance and counseling skills, can strengthen this relationship. Competitive schemes in the process of awarding Teaching, Research and Student Grants are expected to enhance the healthy academic atmosphere. A fair teaching and learning process evaluation system with students' involvement shall be carried out to complete the activity.	
Objective: To build a strong relationship among all components of the Study Program in order to improve the academic atmosphere.	
Mechanism and design  :	
A.1.1.	Improving teaching methods by providing Teaching Grants to the achievers in a competitive scheme	
A.1.2.	Improving the students’ research qualities by providing Student Grants to the achievers in a competitive scheme 	
A.1.3.	Improving the staffs’ research qualities by providing Research Grants to the achievers in a competitive scheme 	
A.1.4.	Developing a teaching and learning process evaluation system involving students	
A.1.5.	Developing the staffs’ advising abilities by providing a Guidance and Counseling Training program.	
A.1.6.	Academic Dialogue and other special events involving all staffs and students, including sport tournaments, engineering expo, and special events to honor the best lecturers, the best students, the employee of the year, etc.  	
A.1.7.	Academic Meetings: Staff and Teaching Assistants,  Staff and Laboratory Technicians/Assistants.	
To be continued in the next page ……

Activity A.1. (continued)	
Resources required :	
Activity	Cost Components 	Cost (Rp.)	Source of  Funding	
A.1.1.	Teaching Grant (2 of Rp20,000,000)	39.800.000,00	TPSDP 	
A.1.2.	Student Grants (10 of Rp. 5,0000,000)	50.000.000,00	TPSDP 	
A.1.3.	Research Grants (2 of Rp30,000,000)	60.000.000,00	TPSDP 	
A.1.4.	Program Development 	At Cost	Others	
A.1.5.	Program Development	4.000.000,00	TPSDP  + DRK	
A.1.6.	Program Development	At Cost	Others	
A.1.7.	Program Development	At Cost	Others	
	TOTAL	153.800.000,00		
Implementation Schedule (By Quarter) :	
Activities	Yr 1	Yr 2	Yr 3	Yr 4	
A.1.1																	
A.1.2																	
A.1.3.																	
A.1.4																	
A.1.5																	
A.1.6																	
A.1.7																	
Performance indicators of Activity :	
Indicators	Baseline	Mid	Status	Final	
Frequency of the special events	Every other year	1 per year	1 per year	2 per year	
Participation in national academic/scientific events for students	N/A	Every other year	Every year	Every year	
Number of scientific papers published in national and international journal per year	N/A	4	11	8	
Number of academic seminars and conferences hosted by the Study Program 	1 – 2 per year	3 per year	1 per year	6 per year	
Sustainability :  In order to keep up all activities running regularly and periodically, All components of study program are expected to participate  in all activities regularly. Thus, these leads to the sustainability of the academic atmosphere. 	
Person in charge: Ir. Zaenab Muslimin 	

2.2. Name of Activity: A.2. Enhancing student's learning skills and reading habits 
Background: The condition of the Study Program’s library is not favorable for the advancement of student’s learning skills and reading habits indicated by the low percentage of students coming in for reading or checking-out books. The explanation behind this condition is that the library has:
•	Very limited collections of references, those that are available are out of date (11 to 20 years old)
•	Limited capacity of bookshelves, so many collections are not kept in order.
•	Reading room is cold, humid and very inconvenient 	
Rationale :
•	The library needs to improve its collection to attract students to come and to improve their learning skills
•	The library needs more bookshelves to keep all book well and neat, otherwise there will be many books spread over the floor and on the table
•	The library needs fixing and renovation in order to create a better and more convenient learning environment.  	
To be continued in the next page ……

Activity A.2. (continued)	
Objective :  To enhance the students’ learning skills and makes reading as their primary habit and to reduce the length of study  	
Mechanism and design :
A.2.1. Preparing the library room condition for better reading convenience
A.2.2. Making a better arrangement of book collections.
A.2.3. Enriching  book collections and the latest published journals..
A.2.4. Establishing and maintaining a computerized library database system integrated to the Department Network. 
A.2.5. Developing and enhancing the students’ learning skills.	
Resources required :	
Activities	Cost Components 	Rp.	US$	Funding Source 	
A.2.1.	Civil Works	0,00		TPSDP	DRK	
A.2.2.	Furniture	0,00		TPSDP		
A.2.3.	Instruction Materials	10,728,045.50	24,586.00	TPSDP		
A.2.4.	Equipment	0,00		TPSDP		
A.2.5.	Program Development	10.000.000,00		TPSDP	DRK	
	TOTAL	20.728.045,50	24,586.00			
Implementation Schedule (By Quarter):	
Activities	Yr 1	Yr 2	Yr 3	Yr 4	
A.2.1.																	
A.2.2.																	
A.2.3.		
Slightly Re-scheduled

A.2.4.																	
A.2.5.																	
Performance indicators of Activity :	
Indicators	Baseline	Mid	Status	Final	
 The number of students visiting in the library (students/day)	10	15	15	22	
The number of books check out(books/day)	9	15	13	18	
The number of students reading in the library (students/day)	2	5	7	10	
Sustainability: All facilities and infrastructures are a long term investment that will still exist even after the project is over. For the continuity of  the learning skills training program after the project is over, contribution from the students’ parent is expected.	
Person in charge: Ir. Hj. Sri Mawar Said	

3. Efficiency and Productivity
Code	Name of Activity	
E.1.	Improving the quality of the classroom teaching and learning process (including the improvement of the qualifications of the Teaching Assistants) 	
E.2.	Expanding the Capacity of the Basic Laboratory Courses: Laboratory I and Laboratory II (Including the Improvement of the Qualifications of the Laboratory Assistants) 	

3.1. Name of Activity: E.1. Improving the quality of the classroom teaching and learning process (including the improvement of the qualifications of the Teaching Assistants) 
Background: Since the end of the Engineering Acceleration Project, the quality of the classroom teaching and learning process tends to decline. This is - among others - due to the increasing number of student population. Moreover, the bureaucracy of the university does not allocate sufficient funding for lecturers’ overtime and incentives. For this particular reason, lecturers used to try to avoid burden they have by accommodating larger students in one class.	
Rationale : The first thing to do to increase the quality of the classroom teaching and learning process is to socialize the vision and mission of the Study Program to all part of departments (lecturers, students, and staffs). Providing high quality classroom facilities, upgrading students-to-lecturer ratio gradually, and decreasing the number of incoming students may also help the situation. In addition to that, high quality teaching-assistantship is a very important factor to support the quality improvement effort.	
Objective: To develop effective classroom teaching and learning process that will produce higher quality graduates.    	
Mechanism and design : 
E.1.1. Identifying problems and socialize them to all components in meetings and discussions. 
E.1.2. Establishing a solid teaching-assistantship. 
E.1.3. Improving the quality of teaching and learning process, especially in the utilization of Internet for education, communication media and educational technology. 
E.1.4. Optimizing room utilization.	
Resources required :	
Activity	Cost Components 	Rp	US$	Funding Source 	
E.1.1.	Program Development	At Cost		Others		
E.1.2.	Program Development	10.000.000,00		TPSDP	DRK	
E.1.3.						
	Equipment	0,00		TPSDP		
E.1.4.	Civil Works	0,00		TPSDP	DRK	
	Furniture	0,00		TPSDP		
TOTAL	10.000.000,00				
Implementation Schedule (By Quarter):	
Activity	Yr 1	Yr 2	Yr 3	Yr 4	
E.1.1.	
Slightly Re-scheduled

E.1.2.																	
E.1.3.																	
E.1.4.																	
Performance indicators of Activity :	
Indicators	Baseline	Mid	Status	Final	
Meeting and discussion (times/month)	-	2	1	4 	
Recruited Teaching Assistants (students/year)	-	30	3	50	
Participation in trainings (persons/year)	-	20	3	40 	
Student-to-lecturer ratio	25:1	18:1	14:1	12:1	
Excess loads per semester (SKS)	150 	75	1.5	0 	
Classrooms (rooms)	5	9	9	9	
Percentage of students who are satisfied with the teaching and learning process.	N/A	50%	N/A	95%	
Sustainability: The improvement of efficiency and productivity of the classroom teaching and learning process will reduce educational costs, so in the long run the benefit will return to the Study Program and to the community.	
Person in charge: Ir.H.Subaer Kanata 	

3.2. Name of Activity: E.2. Expanding the Capacity of the Basic Laboratory Courses: Laboratory I and Laboratory II (Including the Improvement of the Qualifications of the Laboratory Assistants).
Background: Basic laboratory courses  (Laboratory I and II) provide 31 experiments in 4 (four) laboratories, i.e. Basic Circuit Laboratory (9 exp.), Radio Telecommunication and Microwave Laboratory (10 exp.), Computer Software Laboratory (3 exp.), and Electrical Machines Laboratory (6 exp.) [see Appendix III.37 on page III-Ap-20]. These laboratory courses are very crowded, they are always conducted in 1 or 2 shifts per day by a group of 4 to 10 students per experiment using very limited modules and equipment – both in terms of the quantity and quality – and limited laboratory spaces experiments. The facilities were intended to accommodate only 100 admitted student  per year, but since 1995 have been forced to accept three times the capacity.  Moreover, the schedule of those laboratory courses is very tight causing Laboratory I and III (odd semester) and Laboratory II and IV (even semester) unable to be committed at the same time, as the consequence of that, supported equipments should be used almost continuously.  The laboratory courses do not serve their purpose to provide students with practical experiences because they have very short time in the laboratory. Upgrading and repairing the number of modules, equipment and renovation and reposition of the room's function will enable the provision of laboratory courses to reach an almost ideal circumstances, for instance: the lab courses can be conducted by 1 shift/day, 3 students/group, and Laboratory I and III (odd semester) and Laboratory II and IV (odd semester) can be conducted at the same time.    	
Rationale 
1.	Repairing/increasing/additional number of modules/equipment will enable:
a.	to improve the number of shifts from 2 to 1 shift per day.
b.	to improve the number of students per group from (4-10) students to (3-6) students per group.
2.	Renovating and reposition of room's function will enable:
a.	to increase the number of groups/experiment/day from 1 group/experiment/day to 2 groups/experiment/day.
b.	to make shorter time range of experiments because Laboratory (I and III) and laboratory (II and IV) are running together.	
Objective: To equip of graduates with a practical understanding of Basic Electrical Engineering courses.    	
Mechanism and design :
E.2.1. Assessing the existing laboratories condition, mainly in terms of organizational and management aspects, environmental and utilities setting, and the quality of laboratory course materials. 
E.2.2. Preparing the standard workplace and required utilities in the laboratories.
E.2.3. Repairing and renewing the existing experiment modules, instruments and parts. Expanding the capacity of the laboratories serving the Laboratory I and II courses.
E.2.4. Commissioning test of the new laboratory equipment.
E.2.5. Developing experiment guides and related laboratory assistant training materials.
E.2.6. Implementing and evaluating the updated experiment modules for Laboratory I and II courses	
Resources required:  	
Sub-activity	Cost Components	Rp	US $	Source of Funding	
E.2.1.	Program Development	    0,00		TPSDP   	DRK	
E.2.2.	Furniture	0,00		TPSDP  		
	Civil Works	0,00		TPSDP  	DRK	
E.2.3.	Equipment 	0,00	0.00	TPSDP  		
E.2.4.						
E.2.5.	Program Development	    10.000.000,00			DRK	
Total	10.000.000,00	0.00		
To be continued in the next page …	
Activity E.2.(continued)	

Implementation Schedule (By Quarter):	
Sub-activity	Yr 1	Yr 2	Yr 3	Yr 4	
E.2.1.																	
E.2.2.	
Delayed

E.2.3.																	
E.2.4.																	
E.2.5.																	
E.2.6.																	
	
Performance indicators of Activity:	
Indicators	Baseline	Mid	Status	Final	
Number of students per-group	4-10	3-6	3-6	2-4	
Repaired, updated and renewed experiment modules and test instruments	0%	50%	25%-50%	100%	
Sustainability : Staff, students and laboratory assistants are expected to maintain and develop these basic laboratory in the long run. They should be self-sufficient in repair and maintenance.	
Person in charge: Ir. H.A. Rasjid Muhammad	

4. Access and Equity
Code	Name of Activity	
AE.	Improving the access and equity of the Study Program for students originated from remote areas in the Eastern Region of Indonesia and other less economically advantageous communities.	
	AE.1	Recruiting and Socializing in Remote Areas in the Region of Indonesia 	
	AE.2.	Developing a Matriculation Program for New Students from Remote Areas 	
	AE.3	Administering and Mediating Student Financial Aids Programs 	

4.1. Name of Activity:  AE. Improving the access and equity of the Study Program for students originated from remote areas in the Eastern Region of Indonesia and other less economically advantageous communities.
Background:  The function of a higher education institution is to accommodate the needs of the people to acquire the skills and knowledge. This should include the people from the less economically advantageous and from remote areas. It is a well known fact that there is a significant gap in the mastery of basic sciences between potential students from suburb and rural area, from down-town and remote places. This gap has made a inequality of opportunity among people to access a higher institution.	
Rationale: It is a social obligation for the Study Program to make an effort to close the gap mention in the background. Socialization of the Study Program will open the opportunity wider to any potential student coming from the remote area and lower economic level, particularly in the Eastern Regionof Indonesia. Developing materials and methods of matriculation sessions intended primarily for recruited students are necessary to be committed in order to equalize their basic scientific knowledge. Negotiating and persuading local government or companies to set up funding for those student is also needed.	
To be continued in the next page …	

Activity AE (continued)	
Objective: To close the gap of opportunity among people in acquiring knowledge and skills from a higher education institution.	
Mechanism and design :
•	AE.1. Recruiting and Socializing in Remote Areas in the Eastern Region of Indonesia
•	AE.2. Developing a Matriculation Program for New Students from Remote Areas 
•	AE.3. Administering and Mediating Student Financial Aids Programs	
Resources required :	
Activity	Cost Components 	Rp.	Funding Source 	
AE.1., 2 and 3	Program Development	At Cost	Others	
Implementation Schedule (By Quarter):	
Activities	Yr 1	Yr 2	Yr 3	Yr 4	
AE.1.																	
AE.2.																	
AE.3.																	
Performance indicators of Activity :	
Indicators	Baseline	Mid	Status	Final	
Percentage of students admitted from remote areas	No data	5%	N/A	10%	
Academic performance of matriculation program participants (average first year GPA)	No data	2.75
	N/A	3.00	
Number of fellowships for students from remote area	0	4	N/A	8	
Sustainability: At the end of the project, it is expected that co-operations with the external parties such as provincial governments, NGOs, companies, alumni, professional association, etc. to take care of this program will continue.	
Person in charge: Ir. Gassing, MT	

5. Internal Management and Organization
Code	Name of Activity	
IMO	Improving the Department’s administration system 	
	IMO.1.	Establishing the Study Program’s Management Information System and Database 	
	IMO.2.	Establishing an Effective Teaching-Learning Process Monitoring and Evaluation System 	

5.1. Name of Activity: IMO Improving the Department’s administration system
Background: One of the problems faced by the Study Program is in handling and processing data for academics and students administration needs. Only 5 (five) department administrative staffs daily serve the needs of around 1000 students. Data lost, improper handling and inaccuracy are not uncommon problems.  	
Rationale: The advantages of having an automatic and integrated  management information system and database are:
•	Easier to make data updating.
•	Faster academic data processing
•	Accessible from the network	
To be continued in the next page …

Activity IMO (continued)	
Objective: To develop a management information system and database for academics and students.	
Mechanism and design :
•	IMO.1.   Establishing the Study Program’s Management Information System and Database 
•	IMO.2.   Establishing an Effective Teaching-Learning Process Monitoring and Evaluation System	
Resources required :	
Activity	Cost Components 	Rp	Funding Source 	
IMO.1.	Equipment	0,00	TPSDP 	
IMO.2.	Equipment	0,00	TPSDP 	
	TOTAL:	 0,00		
Implementation Schedule (By Quarter):	
Activities	Yr 1	Yr 2	Yr 3	Yr 4	
IMO.1																	
IMO.2.																	
	
Performance indicators of Activity :	
Indicators	Baseline	Mid	Status	Final	
Service time	1 day	-	30 minutes	5  minutes	
Data Archive Update	14 days	-	Every Minute	Every Minute	
Monitoring and Evaluation	N/A	-	Available	Available	
Sustainability : Students participation in system maintenance and development	
Person in charge: Ir. Indrajaya M, MT	

Chapter 2.3. THIRD YEAR IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

		2.3.1. PROJECT ORGANIZATION
	
The organizational set-up of the Project will reflect the on-going process that has been started since the preparation of the Self-Evaluation Report of the TPSDP Batch 1 in the year 2000. The structure of the organization is clearly described in Figure II-2. There are 11 (eleven) Persons in Charge, each one for each activity. Those Persons in Charge produced the list of sub-activities to improve RAISE++ as elaborated previously in Chapter 2.2, so it is clear that they have been involved since the planning stages of this project. 

Quality Assurance
Dr. Ir. H. Nadjamuddin Harun, MS
Prof. Dr. Ir. H.M. Arief, Dipl.Ing.

The Study Program Project Coordinator
Ir. H. Tahir Ali	
		
			Project Secretary:
Muhammad Niswar, ST, MIT	

ACTIVITIES	PERSONS IN CHARGE:	
R.1. Advance Laboratory Courses Update	Ir. Hj. Nien K. Nauman	
R.2. Industrial Relation Programs	Ir. A. Toyib Rahardjo, M.Sc	
R.3. NEW Teaching/Laboratory Courses Development	Dr.Ir.H. Rhiza S. Sadjad, MSEE	
R.4. Student Co-Curricular Activities 	Faizal A. Samman, ST, MT	
R.5. Staff Composition and Qualification Improvement	Prof. Dr. Ir. M. Tola, M.Eng.	
A.1. Departmental Meeting and Dialogue	Ir. Zaenab Muslimin 	
A.2. Student’s Learning and Reading Skills Enhancement  	Ir. Dewiani, MT	
E.1. Classroom Teaching-Learning  Process Improvement	Ir. H. Subaer Kanata	
E.2. Basic Laboratory Courses Expansion and Quality Improvement	Ir. H.A. Rasjid Muhammad	
AE  Remote Area “Reaching-Out” Program	Ir. Gassing, MT	
IMO  Department’s MIS and Database Development	Ir. Indra Jaya Mansyur, MT	
		
Figure II-2 
The Organizational Structure of the Project at the Study Program level	

The person who is now the Chairman of the Task Force - that was formed by the Department to take care of the preparation of the Study Program’s Self Evaluation Report and the TPSDP Sub-Project Proposal, both Batch 1 and Batch 2 - will lead the organizational structure of the project at the Study Program level as the Project Coordinator. He will be responsible also as a contact person or representative of the Study Program at the University level. A Project Secretary helps him to take care of the administrative aspects of the project. 

Since this project is an activity-based project then the main parts of the project organization are the Persons in Charge of all activities. All the persons in charge have been involved at the preparation stage of this Sub-Project Proposal. They started by writing the background and the rationale of each activity they are going to take care of whenever the project is granted. After those were clear, then they continued with the planning of the activities, including preparing the budget allocation plan. 

2.3.2. ACTIVITY and SCHEDULING
Details of all planned activities in this project have been thoroughly discussed in previous sections in terms of the sub-activities. Basically at the third year term of the implementation of this project, most activities will be scheduled as the continuation of the activities originally planned to be implemented at the first and second year term. The activities that were already planned to be implemented in the third year term of the project are to be implemented as planned. 

	2.3.3. MONITORING and EVALUATION MECHANISM

The principle of the "Total Quality Management" (TQM) will be applied in all monitoring and evaluation mechanism of this project. It means that all monitoring and evaluation mechanism will be embedded in all sub-activities without exception.  

There are at least 2 (two) categories of monitoring activities, namely the monitoring of the physical implementation of the proposed project itself, and the monitoring of the educational process as the result of the project. The latter (including monitoring of the laboratory activities, classroom activities, the teaching and learning process, student extra-curricular and co-curricular activities, etc.) will become parts of the Activity IMO (see page Revised-SPP II-17), and the follow-up of this activity will be taken care of by Activity E.1. (see Revised SPP page II-12). The results of this monitoring mechanism will be the mid-term and the final-term data to compute the performance indicators discussed previously.

A built-in mechanism will be applied to all activities led by each Person in Charge, including the procurement process of all laboratory equipment and experiment modules, the implementation of staff development sub-activities, administration, civil works and teaching facilities improvement. All procurement within the project plan should be monitored closely. This will include the process of annual budget revisions, the preparation of bidding documents, the bidder selection, up to testing and commissioning and after sales services and user training if necessary. The monitoring mechanism for all civil works implementation, for instance, should include the selection of building consultants, the physical design and cost-estimation, the bidding and selection of contractors, the implementation supervisory activities and commissioning. 

A continuous (at least weekly, or more often if necessary) evaluation mechanism should be applied to the project implementation. All Persons in Charge should prepare their reports at least in a weekly basis to the Project Coordinator. All performance indicators should be compiled every semester and presented in a general staff meeting to determine any progress made. The fourth general staff meeting will be the mid-term project. All mid-term performance targets will be evaluated to determine whether the project should be continued to the next half term or just terminated there. If the project continues, then over-all revisions should be made to secure the achievement of all final performance targets and the sustainability of this project.

At the end of the fourth year of the project implementation, a thorough evaluation should be made in order to guarantee the public accountability of this project. This evaluation may have to involve all stakeholders, including the students' parental-representatives, the industrial world, the local and central government, and all other concerned parties. The Study Program may be planning to implement the international standard of higher education accreditation systems - such as the ABET criteria - at this stage.  The final evaluation will be the commencement of the end of the project and at the same time it will become a mechanism to build the commitment to work together for the long future of the Study Program. The Quality Assurance Team will closely supervise all those mechanisms.

Chapter 2.4. PROPOSED BUDGET

Figure II-3 shows the budget plan for the third year term, which is detailed in terms of activities in Figure II-5.
Eligible Cost Components	YEAR3	
	ADB	GOI (Rp)	DRK	
	US$	Rp	US$	TPSDP	Rp	
1.	Staff Development	 	 	 	 	 	
 	v Domestic degree training	 	0.00	 	39,600,000.00	 	
 	v Domestic non degree training	 	0.00	 	56,650,000.00	 	
 	v Overseas degree training	118,700.00	 	 	 	 	
 	v Overseas non degree training	0.00	 	 	 	 	
2.	Civil Works	 	19,630,511.60	 	42,605,360.80	0.00	
3.	Furniture and Equipment	 	 	 	 	 	
 	v Furniture	 	0.00	 	0.00	 	
 	v Equipment	36,281.10	4,199,000.00	48,000.00	9,826,000.00	 	
4.	Program Development	 	 	 	24,150,325.50	38,139,674.50	
5.	Instructional Materials	13,207.24	10,728,045.50	11,378.76	0.00	 	
6.	Consultant Services	 	 	 	 	 	
 	v International	 	 	 	 	 	
 	v Domestic	 	 	 	 	 	
7.	Research and Studies	 	50,000,000.00	 	130,000,000.00	 	
8.	Project Management	 	 	 	 	 	
 	v Operational support	 	 	 	 	30,000,000.00	
 	v O&M of Facilities	 	 	 	 	38,978,116.50	
 	v Sub-PIU Operation	 	 	 	 	94,770,000.00	
TOTAL	168,188.34	84,557,557.10	59,378.76	302,831,686.30	201,887,791.00	
 	60.00%	32.00%	8.00%	

Figure II-5
Proposed Budget for the Third Year Term 2005

Eligible Cost Components	YEAR3	
	ADB	GOI 	DRK	
	US$	Rp	US$	TPSDP Rp	Rp	
1.	Staff Development	 	 	 	 	 	
 	v Domestic degree training	 	0.00	 	39,600,000.00	 	
 	v Domestic non degree training	 	0.00	 	56,650,000.00	 	
 	v Overseas degree training	118,700.00	 	 	 	 	
 	v Overseas non degree training	0.00	 	 	 	 	
2.	Civil Works	 	19,630,511.60	 	42,605,360.80	0.00	
 	R.1	 	19,630,511.60	 	42,605,360.80	0.00	
 	A.2	 	0.00	 	0.00	0.00	
 	E.1	 	0.00	 	0.00	0.00	
 	E.2	 	0.00	 	0.00	0.00	
3.	Furniture and Equipment	 	 	 	 	 	
 	v Furniture	 	0.00	 	0.00	 	
 	R.1	 	 	 	 	 	
 	A.2	 	 	 	 	 	
 	E.1	 	 	 	 	 	
 	E.2	 	 	 	 	 	
 	v Equipment	36,281.10	4,199,000.00	48,000.00	9,826,000.00	0.00	
 	R.1	15,051.10	4,199,000.00	48,000.00	9,826,000.00	0.00	
 	R.3.1	21,230.00	0.00	 	0.00	0.00	
 	R.3.2	0.00	0.00	 	0.00	0.00	
 	R.4	0.00	0.00	 	0.00	0.00	
 	A.2	0.00	0.00	 	0.00	0.00	
 	E.1	0.00	0.00	 	0.00	0.00	
 	E.2	0.00	0.00	 	0.00	0.00	
 	IMO.1	0.00	0.00	 	0.00	0.00	
 	IMO.2	0.00	0.00	 	0.00	0.00	
4.	Program Development	 	 	 	24,150,325.50	38,139,674.50	
 	R.1.1	 	 	 	0.00	0.00	
 	R.1.5	 	 	 	2,000,000.00	3,000,000.00	
 	R.2.1	 	 	 	8,000,000.00	12,000,000.00	
 	R.2.2	 	 	 	0.00	0.00	
 	R.2.3.	 	 	 	0.00	0.00	
 	R.4.1	 	 	 	0.00	0.00	
 	R.4.2	 	 	 	3,600,000.00	4,400,000.00	
 	R.4.4	 	 	 	650,325.50	6,639,674.50	
 	A.1.5	 	 	 	1,800,000.00	2,200,000.00	
 	A.2.5	 	 	 	3,600,000.00	4,400,000.00	
 	E.1.2/3	 	 	 	4,500,000.00	5,500,000.00	
 	E.2.1	 	 	 	0.00	0.00	
 	E.2.5.	 	 	 	0.00	0.00	
5.	Instructional Materials	13,207.24	10,728,045.50	11,378.76	0.00	 	
 	R.4.3	0.00	0.00		0.00	 	
 	A.2.3	13,207.24	10,728,045.50	11,378.76	0.00	 	
6.	Consultant Services	 	 	 	 	 	
 	v International	 	 	 	 	 	
 	v Domestic	 	 	 	 	 	
7.	Research and Studies	 	50,000,000.00	 	130,000,000.00	 	
 	R.3.1	 	20,000,000.00	 	0.00	 	
 	A.1.1	 	0.00	 	20,000,000.00	 	
 	A.1.2	 	0.00	 	50,000,000.00	 	
 	A.1.3	 	30,000,000.00	 	60,000,000.00	 	
8.	Project Management	 	 	 	 	163,748,116.50	
 	v Operational support	 	 	 	 	30,000,000.00	
 	v O&M of Facilities	 	 	 	 	38,978,116.50	
 	v Sub-PIU Operation	 	 	 	 	94,770,000.00	
TOTAL	168,188.34	84,557,557.10	59,378.76	302,831,686.30	201,887,791.00	
 	60.00%	32.00%	8.00%	

Figure II-6
Proposed Budget for the Third Year Term 2005 (per-Activity) 

Appendix - 1
Detailed Specifications : Staff Development - Domestic Degree Training - Year 3	
Name of Tentative Candidates	Field Of Study	Targeted University to apply 	Estimated Length
Of study	Estimated Cost (Rp.)	Program	
Indra Bayu 	Telecommunication	ITS 	Expected to complete by Sept. 2005	9,950,000.00	S2	
			Total Cost :	9.950.000,00		

Appendix – 2
Detailed Specifications : Staff Development - Domestic  Non - Degree Training-year 3			
Name of Tentative Lectures	Field Of Study	Targeted University/Institution to Apply	Estimated Length of Study (months)	Estimated Cost	
					
Christoforus Y.	Computer Engineering	ITB	2	13,750,000.00	
M.Niswar	Computer Engineering	INIXINDO, Surabaya	1	13,750,000.00	
Amil A Ilham	Computer Engineering	INIXINDO, Surabaya	1	13,750,000.00	
M.Tola	Electrical Power	UI	1	7,700,000.00	
Nadjamuddin Harun	Control System	UGM	1	7,700,000.00	
			Total Cost :	56,650,000.00	

Name of Tentative 	Field Of Study	Targeted University/Institution to Apply 	Estimated Length (month)	Estimated Cost (Rp)	
					
Laboratory Technicians :	
Suleman Lebang	Laboratory Maintenance	Pusdiklat PLN Wilayah VIII	1	*2,000,000.00	
Cornelius Pelluk	Laboratory Maintenance	Pusdiklat PLN Wilayah VIII	1	*2,000,000.00	
Idris Hamid	Laboratory Maintenance	Pusdiklat PLN Wilayah VIII	1	*2,000,000.00	
Mustakim,ST	Laboratory Maintenance	BLK Makassar	1	*2,250,000.00	
Amsal Salim,ST	Laboratory Maintenance	BLK Makassar	1	*2,250,000.00	
Sampara,ST	Computer Networking	Cordova Computer	1	*2,250,000.00	
Administrative Staff :	
Hasrawati	Office Management	LPM Fajar	1	*1,750,000.00	
Hasdiana	Office Management	LPM Fajar	1	*1,750,000.00	
Mustawil	Computer Networking	Cordova Computer	1	*2,250,000.00	
Ruslan	Maintenance	BLK Makassar	1	*2,250,000.00	
Samsiah	Office Management	LPM Fajar	1	*1,750,000.00	
Zainuddin	Maintenance	BLK Makassar	1	*2,250,000.00	
			Total Cost :	23,725,000.00	

•	Budget updated

Appendix – 3
Detailed Specifications : Staff Development - Overseas Degree training - year 3			
Name of Tentative 	Field Of Study	Targeted University 	Estimated Length	Estimated	Program	
Candidates	 	to apply	of study(years)	Cost	 	
Tadjuddin Waris	Electrical Power	Curtin University, Australia	1.00	21000	S3	
Elyas Palantei	Telecommunication	Griffith University, Australia	1.00	21000	S3	
Samuel Panggalo	Telecommunication	University of Newcastle, Australia	1.00	21000	S3	
Hasniaty	Telecommunication	UTM, Malaysia	1.00	13200	S3	
Wardi	Telecommunication	University of South Australia, Australia	1.00	21500	S2	
6			Total Cost :	97700		

Appendix-4

Detailed Specifications : Staff Development - Overseas non-Degree Training – Year 3	
Name of Tentative 	Field Of Study	Targeted University/Institution 	Estimated Length	Estimated	
Candidates	 	to apply	of study(days)	Cost (US$)	
Muhammad Niswar	 Telecommunication	 International Conference, Hongkong	 3	 1600	

Appendix-5

Detailed Specifications : Civil Works 					
							
No.	Facilities	Requirment 	Function	Quantity	Estimated	Remark	
 	 	Specification	 	(m2)	Cost (Rp)	 	
 	 		 		 	 	
 	Laboratory		 		 	 	
1	Basic Laboratory	Building repair and minor	Quality	618	57165000	E.2	
 	 	 renovation	 		 	 	
2	Advanced Laboratory	Building repair , minor	Expanding and	969.14	1.56E+08	R.1	
 	 	 and mayor renovation	 quality		 	 	
3	Class room 	Building repair , minor	Expanding and	649	2.15E+08	E.1	
 	 	 and mayor renovation	 quality		 	 	
4	Library	Building repair , minor	Quality	84	16540000	A.2	
 	 	 and mayor renovation	 		 	 	
 	 		 		 	 	
 	 	 	TOTAL	2320.14	4.45E+08	 	

NO	FACILITIES	SPESIFICATION	UNIT	UNIT COST	TOTAL	TOTAL 	
 	 	 	 	(Rp,-)	 	COST (Rp)	
 		 		 		 	
A.2	LIBRARY	 		 		 	
1	Wall painting	Like as ICI	M2	20000	110	2200000	
2	Lighting installation and armature	TL: 2X36 W, recessed type	unit	250000	12	3000000	
3	Ceiling,support & acces.	plywod,steel support	M2	135000	84	11340000	
 		 		 		 	
 	 	 	 	 	TOTAL A.2	16540000	
E.1	 CLASS ROOM: HL-X  	 		 		 	
1	Concrete for colum	K.225	M3	1900000	16	30400000	
2	Concrete for beam	K.225	M3	1900000	12	22800000	
3	Concrete for floor	K.225	M3	1900000	16	30400000	
4	Brick	 Local product, hight quality	M3	300000	20.55	6165000	
5	Covered with plaster 1:5	 	M2	30000	112	3360000	
6	Pour Cement fondation	K.225	M3	2000000	5	10000000	
7	Ceramic tiles	WHITE 30X30	M2	50000	133	6650000	
8	Wall painting	Like as ICI	M2	20000	110	2200000	
9	Door with frame	Bayam wood	unit	400000	2	800000	
10	Window with frame	Bayam wood	unit	300000	8	2400000	
11	Lighting installation and armature	TL 2x36 W,recessed type ref:Philips	unit	250000	12	3000000	
12	Power Instalation and acces.	Receptacle  ref : MK	unit	150000	4	600000	
13	Partition	wood	M2	100000	40	4000000	
14	Ceiling	Ply wood , with hanger steel 	M2	135000	133	17955000	
15	Railing	Medium pipe,dia. 3 inci	M2	35000	38	1330000	
 	 	 	 	 	Sub.Total	142060000	
 	CLASS ROOM: PBT 301	 		 		 	
1	Wall painting	Like as ICI	M2	15000	250	3750000	
2	Door repairment	 	M2	75000	1	75000	
3	Ceramic tiles	WHITE 30X30	M2	0	60	0	
4	Electrical Installatian repairment	Quality like as : Philips	unit	50000	0	0	
5	Door potection 	Steel	unit	500000	0	 	
 	 	 	 	 	Sub Total	3825000	
 	CLASS ROOM: PBT 302	 	 	 	 	 	
1	Wall painting	Like as ICI	M2	15000	250	3750000	
2	Door repairment	 	unit	75000	1	75000	
3	Ceramic tiles	WHITE 30X30	M2	0	60	0	
4	Electrical Installatian repairment	Quality like as : Philips	unit	50000	0	0	
5	Door potection 	 	unit	500000	0	0	
 	 	 	 	 	Sub Total	3825000	
 	CLASS ROOM: PBT 303	 		 		 	
1	Wall painting	Like as ICI	M2	15000	250	3750000	
2	Door repairment	 	unit	75000	1	75000	
3	Ceramic tiles	WHITE 30X30	M2	0	60	0	
4	Electrical Installatian repairment	Quality like as : Philips	unit	50000	0	0	
5	Door potection 	 	unit	500000	0	0	
 	 	 	 	 	Sub Total	3825000	
 	CLASS ROOM: PBT 304	 		 		 	
1	Wall painting	Like as ICI	M2	15000	356.67	5350019	
2	Door repairment	 	unit	75000	1	75000	
3	Ceramic tiles	WHITE 30X30	M2	0	80	0	
4	Electrical Installatian repairment	Quality like as : Philips	unit	50000	0	0	
5	Door potection 	 	unit	500000	0	0	
 	 	 	 	 	Sub Total	5425019	
 	CLASS ROOM: PBT 401-A.B.C	 		 		 	
1	Wall painting	Like as ICI	M2	15000	1369	20535000	
2	Door repairment	 	unit	75000	4	300000	
3	Ceramic tiles	WHITE 30X30	M2	0	256	0	
4	Electrical Installatian repairment	Quality like as : Philips	unit	150000	10	1500000	
5	Door potection 	 	unit	500000	0	0	
6	Partition , support and acces	portable,gipsun 	M2	325000	96	31200000	
 	 	 	 	 	Sub Total	53535000	
 	STUDENT SERV. FACILITIES	 		 		 	
 	TOILET (Repairment)	 	unit	1000000	3	3000000	
1	Electrical Installatian repairment	 	lot	 		 	
2	Plumbing  Installatian repairment	 	lot	 		 	
3	Ceramic tiles	WHITE 30X30	M2	0	48	 	
4	Urinoir, etc	 	lot	 	Sub Total	3000000	
 	 	 	 	 	TOTAL  E1.	215495019	
E.2	DEVELOPMENT QUALITY	 		 		 	
 	BASIC CIRCUIT LABORATORY	 		 		 	
1	Wall painting	Like as ICI	 	15000	144	2160000	
2	Door repairment	 	unit	75000	2	150000	
3	Ceramic tiles	WHITE 30X30	M2	50000	180	9000000	
4	Electrical Installatian repairment	lihgting fixture & recep.	unit	150000	20	3000000	
5	Door potection 	 	unit	500000	2	1000000	
7	Partition , support and acces	portable,gipsun 	M2	400000	0	0	
 	 	 	 	 	Sub Total	15310000	
 	ELECTRICAL MACHINE LAB.	 		 		 	
1	Wall painting	Like as ICI	M2	15000	333	4995000	
2	Door repairment	 	unit	75000	2	150000	
3	Ceramic tiles	WHITE 30X30	M2	50000	216	10800000	
4	Electrical Installatian lighting fixture	Exposed type TL: 2x36 W	unit	250000	10	2500000	
5	Door potection 	 	unit	500000	2	1000000	
7	Partition , support and acces	 	M2	100000	20	2000000	
 	 	 	 	 	Sub Total	21445000	
 	PREPARATION CLASS	 		 		 	
1	Wall painting	Like as ICI	M2	15000	100	1500000	
2	Door repairment	 	unit	100000	0	0	
3	Ceramic tiles	WHITE 30X30	M2	50000	112	5600000	
4	Electrical Installatian lighting fixture	Exposed type TL: 2x36 W	unit	250000	0	0	
5	Rolling door	 	unit	1E+07	0	0	
6	Partition , support and acces	 	M2	100000	0	0	
7	Roop repair	 	M2	20000	0	0	
 	 	 	 	 	Sub Total	7100000	
 	SOFTWARE LABORATORY(HME)	 		 		 	
1	Wall painting	Like as ICI	M2	15000	144	2160000	
2	Door repairment	 	unit	75000	2	150000	
3	Ceramic tiles	WHITE 30X30	M2	50000	110	5500000	
4	Electrical Installatian repairment	lihgting fixture & recep.	unit	150000	10	1500000	
5	Door potection 	 	unit	500000	0	0	
6	Partition , support and acces	 	M2	100000	40	4000000	
 		 		 	Sub Total	13310000	
 	 	 	 	 	TOTAL E.2	57165000	
R.1	ADVANCED LABORATORY	 		 		 	
 	RADIO TEL.& MICROWAVE	 		 		 	
1	Wall painting	Like as ICI	M2	15000	144	2160000	
2	Door repairment	 	unit	75000	1	75000	
3	Ceramic tiles	WHITE 30X30	M2	50000	152	7600000	
4	Electrical Installatian repairment	lihgting fixture & recep.	unit	150000	12	1800000	
5	Door potection 	 	unit	500000	1	500000	
6	Partition , support and acces	 	M2	100000	0	0	
 	 	 	 	 	Sub Total	12135000	
 	TELEMATICS	 		 		 	
1	Wall painting	Like as ICI	M2	15000	100	1500000	
2	Door repairment	 	unit	75000	1	75000	
3	Ceramic tiles	WHITE 30X30	M2	50000	152	7600000	
4	Electrical Installatian repairment	lihgting fixture & recep.	unit	150000	4	600000	
5	Door potection 	 	unit	500000	1	500000	
6	Partition , support and acces	 	M2	100000	0	0	
 	 	 	 	 	Sub Total	10275000	
 	POWER ELECTRONICS LAB.	 		 		 	
1	Wall painting	Like as ICI	M2	15000	154	2310000	
2	Door repairment	 	unit	75000	2	150000	
3	Ceramic tiles	WHITE 30X30	M2	50000	110	5500000	
4	Electrical Installatian repairment	lihgting fixture & recep.	unit	150000	6	900000	
5	Door potection 	 	unit	500000	2	1000000	
6	Cost renovation and doors	 	lot	1500000	1	1500000	
 	 	 	 	 	Sub Total	11360000	
 	CONTROL COMP. & INSTRUMENT	 		 		 	
1	Wall painting	Like as ICI	M2	15000	150	2250000	
2	Door repairment	 	unit	75000	2	150000	
3	Ceramic tiles	WHITE 30X30	M2	50000	152	7600000	
4	Electrical Installatian repairment	lihgting fixture & recep.	unit	150000	12	1800000	
5	Door potection 	 	unit	500000	2	1000000	
6	Partition , support and acces	 	M2	100000	0	0	
 	 	 	 	 	Sub Total	12800000	
 	ELECTRONIC AND DEVICE	 		 		 	
1	Wall painting	Like as ICI	M2	15000	150	2250000	
2	Door repairment	 	unit	75000	1	75000	
3	Ceramic tiles	WHITE 30X30	M2	50000	75.5	3775000	
4	Electrical Installatian repairment	lihgting fixture & recep.	unit	150000	5	750000	
5	Door potection 	 	unit	500000	1	500000	
6	Partition , support and acces	 	M2	100000	0	0	
 	 	 	 	 	Sub Total	7350000	
 	HIGH VOLTAGE LAB.	 		 		 	
1	Wall painting	Like as ICI	M2	15000	168.332	2524981	
2	Door repairment	 	unit	75000	1	75000	
3	Ceramic tiles	WHITE 30X30	M2	50000	139.64	6982000	
4	Electrical Installatian 	lihgting fixture	unit	250000	6	1500000	
5	Door potection 	 	unit	500000	0	0	
6	Partition , support and acces	 	M2	100000	20	2000000	
7	Jar equipment repairment	 	unit	1500000	1	1500000	
 	 	 	 	 	Sub Total	14581981	
 	RELEY & MEASURE. LAB.	 		 		 	
1	Wall painting	Like as ICI	M2	15000	102.3	1535000	
2	Door repairment	 	unit	100000	0	0	
3	Ceramic tiles	WHITE 30X30	m2	0	84	0	
4	Electrical Installatian repairment	lihgting fixture & recep.	unit	150000	0	0	
5	Door potection 	 	unit	500000	0	0	
6	Partition , support and acces	 bayam /teak wood	M2	100000	0	0	
 	 	 	 	 	Sub Total	1535000	
 	DISTRIBUTION & INSTL. LAB.	 		 		 	
1	Concrete for colum	K.225	M3	1900000	12.49	22358700	
2	Concrete for beam	K.225	M3	1900000	9.2	17480000	
3	Concrete for floor	K.225	M3	1900000	9.412	17882800	
4	Brick	Local product	M3	300000	6	1800000	
5	Covered with plaster 1:5	 	M2	30000	48	1440000	
6	Pour Cement fondation	K.225	M3	2000000	2	4000000	
7	Ceramic tiles	WHITE 30X30	M2	50000	104	5200000	
8	Wall painting	Like as ICI	M2	20000	99.56	1991200	
9	Door with frame	bayam wood	unit	500000	2	1000000	
10	Window with frame	bayam wood	unit	300000	2	600000	
11	Lighting installation and armature	ref: Phillips	unit	250000	6	1500000	
12	Power Instalation and acces.	 	unit	150000	4	600000	
13	Room Partition	wood	M2	100000	0	0	
14	Ceiling and support & acces.	plywood	M2	135000	62	8370000	
15	Railing	Medium pipe,dia. 3 inci	M2	35000	38	1330000	
 		 		 	Sub.Total	    85,552,700.00 	
 	 	 	 	 	TOTAL R.1	  155,589,681.00 	

Appendix - 7	
Detailed specification : Equipment & Furniture - Equipment Year 3 	
Equipment	Spesification	QTY	Unit Cost	Estimated Cost 	Remark	
 	 	 	(US $)	(US $)	 	
Bacis Exp. For Optical Transmission Tech.	 	 	 	 	R.1.IV.2.1.1	
(Equiv. MTS 7.2.6.1 Leybold) Consist of :	 	 	 	 	R.1.IV.2.1.1.1	
Fiber - Optic Transmitter	Equiv. 736411 Leybold	1	255.42	255.42	R.1.IV.2.1.1.2	
Fiber - Optic Receiver	Equiv. 736412 Leybold	1	197.08	197.08	R.1.IV.2.1.1.3	
Fiber Micropositioner	Equiv. 736415 Leybold	1	536.25	536.25	R.1.IV.2.1.1.4	
Mode Scrambler	Equiv. 736416 Leybold	1	31.25	31.25	R.1.IV.2.1.1.5	
Set of Fiber- Optic Waveguides & Accessoris	Equiv. 736421 Leybold	1	294.58	294.58	R.1.IV.2.1.1.6	
Fiber-Optic Microscope	Equiv. 736429 Leybold	1	118.33	118.33	R.1.IV.2.1.1.7	
Hand-Held Power Meter, Optical	Equiv. 736435 Leybold	1	473.33	473.33	R.1.IV.2.1.1.8	
Coil 1000 Turns	Equiv. 59084 Leybold	1	24.17	24.17	R.1.IV.2.1.1.9	
Iron Core 18 x 18 x 55 mm	Equiv. 59085 Leybold	1	12.29	12.29	R.1.IV.2.1.1.10	
Data Transmission With Fibre Optic Lines	 	 	 	 	R.1.IV.2.1.2	
(Equiv. PTS 7.2.6.2 Leybold ) consist of :	 	 	 	 	R.1.IV.2.1.2.1	
Fiber Optic Adapter	Equiv. 736401 Leybold	1	637.08	637.08	R.1.IV.2.1.2.2	
Fiber Micropositioner	Equiv. 736415 Leybold	1	536.25	536.25	R.1.IV.2.1.2.3	
Mode Scrambler	Equiv. 736416 Leybold	1	31.25	31.25	R.1.IV.2.1.2.4	
Set of FSMA Optical Fibers	Equiv. 736425 Leybold	1	435.00	435.00	R.1.IV.2.1.2.5	
Hand-Held Power Meter, Optical	Equiv. 736435 Leybold	1	473.33	473.33	R.1.IV.2.1.2.6	
Fiber-Optic Microscope	Equiv. 736429 Leybold	1	118.33	118.33	R.1.IV.2.1.2.7	
Accessories :	 	 	 	 	R.1.IV.2.1.2.8	
  c. Panel Frame	Equiv. 726063 Leybold	1	157.92	157.92	R.1.IV.2.1.2.9	
  d. Connecting Lead 25 cm Black	Equiv. 500414 Leybold	1	2.58	2.58	R.1.IV.2.1.2.10	
  e. Connecting Lead 200 cm Black	Equiv. 500454 Leybold	4	3.00	12.00	R.1.IV.2.1.2.11	
  h. Set 10 Bridging Plugs Black	Equiv. 501511 Leybold	2	17.13	34.26	R.1.IV.2.1.2.12	
Digital Multimeter C. A. 5220	Equiv. 53117 Leybold	2	116.67	233.34	R.1.IV.2.1.2.13	
Probe 100 MHz  1:1/10:1	Equiv. 578231 Leybold	2	27.50	55.00	R.1.IV.2.1.2.14	
Screened Cable BNC / 4mm Plug	Equiv. 57524 Leybold	2	15.00	30.00	R.1.IV.2.1.2.15	
Adapter BNC / 4 mm Socket, 2 pole	Equiv. 57535 Leybold	1	9.58	9.58	R.1.IV.2.1.2.16	
BNC Cable L = 2 m	Equiv. 501022 Leybold	1	16.29	16.29	R.1.IV.2.1.2.17	
Plug-In Power Supply 230 V, 20 W	Equiv. 562791 Leybold	2	30.42	60.84	R.1.IV.2.1.2.18	
DC -PowerSupply 15V / 3 A	Equiv. 72886 Leybold	1	404.58	404.58	R.1.IV.2.1.2.19	
Manual : Basic Experiments In FO Comm. Eng.	Equiv. 564482 Leybold	1	40.83	40.83	R.1.IV.2.1.2.20	
Manual : Data Trans. With FO Waveguides	Equiv. 564492 Leybold	1	43.75	43.75	R.1.IV.2.1.2.21	
Microwave Technology	 	 	 	 	R.1.IV.2.1.3	
(Equiv. MTS 7.4.1 Leybold) Consist of:	 	 	 	 	R.1.IV.2.1.3.1	
Gunn Oscillator	Equiv.  73701 Leybold	1	560.83	560.83	R.1.IV.2.1.3.2	
Gunn Power Supply with SWR Meter	Equiv. 737021  Leybold	1	1,445.42	1,445.42	R.1.IV.2.1.3.3	
Large Horn Antenna	Equiv. 73721  Leybold	1	112.50	112.50	R.1.IV.2.1.3.4	
Physics Microwave Accessories I	Equiv. 73727  Leybold	1	201.25	201.25	R.1.IV.2.1.3.5	
E - Field Probe	Equiv. 73735  Leybold	1	287.92	287.92	R.1.IV.2.1.3.6	
Parallel Plate Line	Equiv. 73707  Leybold	1	909.17	909.17	R.1.IV.2.1.3.7	
Measuring Carriage for Parallel Plate Line	Equiv. 737071  Leybold	1	639.58	639.58	R.1.IV.2.1.3.8	
Parallel Plate Accessories Line	Equiv. 73728  Leybold	1	458.33	458.33	R.1.IV.2.1.3.9	
Coax Detector	Equiv. 73703  Leybold	1	419.17	419.17	R.1.IV.2.1.3.10	
Transition Waveguide/Coax	Equiv. 737035  Leybold	1	424.58	424.58	R.1.IV.2.1.3.11	
Variable attenuator	Equiv. 73709  Leybold	1	585.00	585.00	R.1.IV.2.1.3.12	
Fixed Attenuator	Equiv. 737095  Leybold	1	174.17	174.17	R.1.IV.2.1.3.13	
Moveable Short	Equiv. 73710  Leybold	1	546.25	546.25	R.1.IV.2.1.3.14	
Slotted Measuring Line	Equiv. 737111  Leybold	1	645.42	645.42	R.1.IV.2.1.3.15	
Waveguide 200 mm	Equiv. 73714 Leybold	1	126.67	126.67	R.1.IV.2.1.3.16	
3-Screw Transformer	Equiv. 737135 Leybold	1	254.17	254.17	R.1.IV.2.1.3.17	
Waveguide Terminatin	Equiv. 73714 Leybold	2	219.58	439.17	R.1.IV.2.1.3.18	
Cross Directional Coupler	Equiv. 73718 Leybold	1	390.00	390.00	R.1.IV.2.1.3.19	
Set of 4 Diaphragms with Slits And Holder	Equiv. 73722 Leybold	1	93.75	93.75	R.1.IV.2.1.3.20	
Waveguide Propagation Accessories	Equiv. 73729 Leybold	1	224.58	224.58	R.1.IV.2.1.3.21	
Set of 10 Thumb Screw M4	Equiv. 737399 Leybold	1	14.17	14.17	R.1.IV.2.1.3.22	
Pin Modulator	Equiv. 73705 Leybold	1	455.83	455.83	R.1.IV.2.1.3.23	
Isolator	Equiv. 73706 Leybold	1	365.83	365.83	R.1.IV.2.1.3.24	
Slide Screw Transformer	Equiv. 73713 Leybold	1	780.00	780.00	R.1.IV.2.1.3.25	
E - Field Probe	Equiv. 73735  Leybold	1	287.92	287.92	R.1.IV.2.1.3.26	
Pin Modulator	Equiv. 73705 Leybold	1	455.83	455.83	R.1.IV.2.1.3.27	
Isolator	Equiv. 73706 Leybold	1	365.83	365.83	R.1.IV.2.1.3.28	
Circulator	Equiv. 737065 Leybold	1	373.75	373.75	R.1.IV.2.1.3.29	
Waveguide Detector	Equiv. 73708 Leybold	1	497.92	497.92	R.1.IV.2.1.3.30	
Waveguide 200 mm	Equiv. 73712 Leybold	1	126.67	126.67	R.1.IV.2.1.3.31	
Waveguide termination	Equiv. 73714 Leybold	1	219.58	219.58	R.1.IV.2.1.3.32	
Phase Shifter	Equiv. 73717 Leybold	1	633.75	633.75	R.1.IV.2.1.3.33	
Magic T	Equiv. 737195 Leybold	1	358.75	358.75	R.1.IV.2.1.3.34	
Gunn Oscillator	Equiv. 73701 Leybold	1	560.83	560.83	R.1.IV.2.1.3.35	
Dielectric Tunning Unit	Equiv. 737015 Leybold	1	132.08	132.08	R.1.IV.2.1.3.36	
Varactor Tuning Unit	Equiv. 737017 Leybold	1	482.50	482.50	R.1.IV.2.1.3.37	
Gunn Power Supply with Modulator Control	Equiv. 737025 Leybold	1	1,034.17	1,034.17	R.1.IV.2.1.3.38	
Frequency Meter	Equiv. 73716 Leybold	1	780.00	780.00	R.1.IV.2.1.3.39	
Large Horn Antenna	Equiv. 73721  Leybold	2	112.50	225.00	R.1.IV.2.1.3.40	
Accessories :	 	 	 	 	R.1.IV.2.1.3.41	
  a. Dig. Storage Oscilloscope	Equiv. 575293 Leybold	1	800.00	800.00	R.1.IV.2.1.3.42	
  b. BNC Cable L = 1 m	Equiv. 501022 Leybold	1	16.29	16.29	R.1.IV.2.1.3.43	
  c. BNC Cable L = 2 m	Equiv. 501022 Leybold	6	16.29	97.74	R.1.IV.2.1.3.44	
  d. BNC T Adapter	Equiv. 501091 Leybold	1	11.46	11.46	R.1.IV.2.1.3.45	
  e. Stand Base MF	Equiv. 30121 Leybold	3	16.67	50.01	R.1.IV.2.1.3.46	
  f. Stand Rod L = 25 cm  D = 10 mm	Equiv.  30126 Leybold	2	4.58	9.16	R.1.IV.2.1.3.47	
  g. Support for Waveguide Components	Equiv. 73715 Leybold	3	52.08	156.24	R.1.IV.2.1.3.48	
 h. 3HU Softcase  63PU 220V	Equiv. 72644 Leybold	1	221.67	221.67	R.1.IV.2.1.3.49	
Manual : Phy. Fund. of  Micr. Technology I	Equiv. 568722 Leybold	1	36.67	36.67	R.1.IV.2.1.3.50	
Manual : Phy. Fund. of  Micr. Technology II	Equiv. 568662 Leybold	1	49.58	49.58	R.1.IV.2.1.3.51	
Manual : Ferrite Comp., Power Divid. & Active Comp.	Equiv. 568752 Leybold	1	36.67	36.67	R.1.IV.2.1.3.52	
Manual : Prop. of Microwave In Waveguides	Equiv. 568732 Leybold	1	49.17	49.17	R.1.IV.2.1.3.53	
Manual : Circuitry with Waveguide Component	Equiv. 568692 Leybold	1	28.75	28.75	R.1.IV.2.1.3.54	
Antenna Technology	 	 	 	 	R.1.IV.2.1.4	
(Equiv. MTS 7.6.1 Leybold) Consist of :	 	 	 	 	R.1.IV.2.1.4.1	
Rotating antenna Platform	Equiv. 737400 Leybold	1	1,302.08	1,302.08	R.1.IV.2.1.4.2	
Gunn Power Supply with SWR Meter	Equiv. 737021  Leybold	1	1,445.42	1,445.42	R.1.IV.2.1.4.3	
Gunn Oscillator	Equiv. 73701 Leybold	1	560.83	560.83	R.1.IV.2.1.4.4	
Large Horn Antenna	Equiv. 73721  Leybold	1	112.50	112.50	R.1.IV.2.1.4.5	
Support for Waveguide Components	Equiv. 73721  Leybold	2	52.08	104.17	R.1.IV.2.1.4.6	
Stand Base MF	Equiv.  30121 Leybold	2	16.67	33.33	R.1.IV.2.1.4.7	
BNC Cable L = 1 m	Equiv. 50102 Leybold	2	16.29	32.58	R.1.IV.2.1.4.8	
Set of Microwave Absorbers	Equiv. 737390 Leybold	1	424.17	424.17	R.1.IV.2.1.4.9	
Set of 10 Thumb Screws M4	Equiv. 737399 Leybold	1	14.17	14.17	R.1.IV.2.1.4.10	
Pin Modulator	Equiv. 73705 Leybold	1	455.83	455.83	R.1.IV.2.1.4.11	
Isolator	Equiv. 73706 Leybold	1	365.83	365.83	R.1.IV.2.1.4.12	
Disk : Directional Patterns	Equiv. 524782 Leybold	1	120.42	120.42	R.1.IV.2.1.4.13	
Cassypack-E	Equiv. 524007 Leybold	1	825.00	825.00	R.1.IV.2.1.4.14	
Screened cable BNC 4 mm Plug	Equiv. 57524 Leybold	1	15.00	15.00	R.1.IV.2.1.4.15	
Matrix printer 24 Needle	Equiv. 728062 Leybold	1	475.83	475.83	R.1.IV.2.1.4.16	
PC Printer Cable	Equiv. 728069 Leybold	1	22.50	22.50	R.1.IV.2.1.4.17	
Case for Antenna Technology	Equiv. 737382 Leybold	1	308.75	308.75	R.1.IV.2.1.4.18	
Personal Computer(Branded)	1. Intel Pentium IV 1.7 GHz (Branded)	1	1,100.00	1,100.00	R.1.IV.2.1.4.19	
Remote Control for rotating Antenna Platform	Equiv. 737401 Leybold	1	259.17	259.17	R.1.IV.2.1.4.20	
Dipole Antenna Kit	Equiv. 737411 Leybold	1	492.50	492.50	R.1.IV.2.1.4.21	
Yagi Antenna Kit	Equiv. 737431 Leybold	1	67.92	67.92	R.1.IV.2.1.4.22	
Large Horn Antenna	Equiv. 73721  Leybold	1	112.50	112.50	R.1.IV.2.1.4.23	
Small Horn Antenna	Equiv. 73720 Leybold	1	112.92	112.92	R.1.IV.2.1.4.24	
Waveguide  200 mm	Equiv. 73712 Leybold	1	126.67	126.67	R.1.IV.2.1.4.25	
Coax Detector	Equiv. 73703 Leybold	1	419.17	419.17	R.1.IV.2.1.4.26	
Transition Waveguide/Coax	Equiv. 737035  Leybold	1	424.58	424.58	R.1.IV.2.1.4.27	
3-Screw Transformer	Equiv. 737135 Leybold	1	254.17	254.17	R.1.IV.2.1.4.28	
Reflector for Diaphragms with Slit	Equiv. 737420 Leybold	1	30.83	30.83	R.1.IV.2.1.4.29	
Physics Microwave Accessories I	Equiv. 73727  Leybold	1	201.25	201.25	R.1.IV.2.1.4.30	
Support for Waveguide Components	Equiv. 73715 Leybold	2	52.08	104.17	R.1.IV.2.1.4.31	
Stand Base MF	Equiv. 30121 Leybold	3	16.67	50.00	R.1.IV.2.1.4.32	
BNC Cable L = 1 m	Equiv.  50102 Leybold	1	16.29	16.29	R.1.IV.2.1.4.33	
Helical Antenna Kit	Equiv. 737440 Leybold	2	274.58	549.17	R.1.IV.2.1.4.34	
E - Bend	Equiv. 737197 Leybold	2	224.17	448.33	R.1.IV.2.1.4.35	
Coax Transition  Male/Female N, 50 Ohm	Equiv. 737033 Leybold	2	19.17	38.33	R.1.IV.2.1.4.36	
Variable attenuator	Equiv. 73709 Leybold	2	585.00	1,170.00	R.1.IV.2.1.4.37	
Steel Tape Measure L = 2M/78"	Equiv. 31177 Leybold	1	5.63	5.63	R.1.IV.2.1.4.38	
Dish antenna Kit	Equiv. 737450 Leybold	1	274.17	274.17	R.1.IV.2.1.4.39	
Slot Antenna	Equiv. 737424 Leybold.	1	317.50	317.50	R.1.IV.2.1.4.40	
Strip-Line Antenna	Equiv. 737427 Leybold	2	317.50	635.00	R.1.IV.2.1.4.41	
Waveguide termination	Equiv. 73714 Leybold	1	219.58	219.58	R.1.IV.2.1.4.42	
Moveable short	Equiv. 73710 Leybold	1	546.25	546.25	R.1.IV.2.1.4.43	
Stand Rod L = 25 cm  D = 10 mm	Equiv. 30126  Leybold	1	4.58	4.58	R.1.IV.2.1.4.44	
Frequency Meter	Equiv. 73716 Leybold	1	780.00	780.00	R.1.IV.2.1.4.45	
Coax Detector	Equiv. 73703 Leybold	1	419.17	419.17	R.1.IV.2.1.4.46	
Transition Waveguide/Coax	Equiv. 737035  Leybold	1	424.58	424.58	R.1.IV.2.1.4.47	
Variable Attenuator	Equiv. 73709 Leybold	1	585.00	585.00	R.1.IV.2.1.4.48	
3-Screw Transformer	Equiv. 737135 Leybold	1	254.17	254.17	R.1.IV.2.1.4.49	
Waveguide Termination	Equiv. 73714 Leybold	1	219.58	219.58	R.1.IV.2.1.4.50	
Cross Directional Coupler	Equiv. 73718 Leybold	1	390.00	390.00	R.1.IV.2.1.4.51	
Waveguides 200 mm	Equiv. 73712 Leybold	1	126.67	126.67	R.1.IV.2.1.4.52	
Support for Waveguide Components	Equiv. 73712 Leybold	2	52.08	104.17	R.1.IV.2.1.4.53	
Set of 4 Diaphragms with Slits And Holder	Equiv. 73722 Leybold	1	93.75	93.75	R.1.IV.2.1.4.54	
Reflector for Diaphragms with Slit	Equiv. 737420 Leybold	1	30.83	30.83	R.1.IV.2.1.4.55	
Stand Base MF	Equiv. 30121 Leybold	2	16.67	33.33	R.1.IV.2.1.4.56	
BNC Cable L = 1 m	Equiv. 50102 Leybold	2	16.29	32.58	R.1.IV.2.1.4.57	
Manual : Student Exp. In Antenna Tech.	Equiv. 568712 Leybold	1	49.58	49.58	R.1.IV.2.1.4.58	
Manual : Antenna Technology	Equiv. 568702 Leybold	1	143.75	143.75	R.1.IV.2.1.4.59	
Personal Computer	1. Intel Pentium IV 1.7 GHz	1	550.00	550.00	R.1.IV.2.1.4.60	
Digital Oscilloscope	DC to 100MHz, 2 CH, 500MHz	2	1,575.00	3,150.00	R.1.III.3.1	
8031 Kit	 	5	525.00	2,625.00	R.1.III.3.2	
Experimental Kit:	 	 	 	 	R.1.III.3.3.1	
a.  LabVIEW Full Development for Windows	 	1	2,045.70	2,045.70	R.1.III.3.3.2	
b. WebDAQ built in web server	 	1	1,200.00	1,200.00	R.1.III.3.3.3	
c. PCI-488 controller	 	1	600.00	600.00	R.1.III.3.3.4	
d. Fast & continues data acquisition (ADC)	 	2	1,000.00	2,000.00	R.1.III.3.3.5	
e. DAC 12 bit 	 	2	400.00	800.00	R.1.III.3.3.6	
f. GPIB Board	 	1	750.00	750.00	R.1.III.3.3.7	
Servo motor Kit	 	2	2,100.00	4,200.00	R.1.III.3.4	
Differential Relay (Percentage/2 Winding)	Type MBCH 12 / MRD1-T2	1	4,410.00	4,410.00	R.1.IV.8.1	
Power Source	110 Vdc 20 A	1	157.50	157.50	R.1.IV.8.2	
1. Real Time Mesurements of Wireless	 	1	5,541.17	5,541.17	R.3.1.1.1	
    (Equiv. TOM Package) Completed with 	 	 	 	 	R.3.1.1.2	
     Software for Analyzing Measurements	 	 	 	 	R.3.1.1.3	
        Equiv. SAM Version 3:0) Consist of:	 	 	 	 	R.3.1.1.4	
   a. Personal Computer	With Windows® 95/98/NT® Operating System	 	 	 	R.3.1.1.5	
 	Pentium III Processor, Minimum of 500 MHz	 	 	 	R.3.1.1.6	
 	128 MB RAM Minimum	 	 	 	R.3.1.1.7	
 	40 GB of Free Hard Disk Space for Installation,	 	 	 	R.3.1.1.8	
 	100 MB Recommended, with Speed  at 7000 rpm	 	 	 	R.3.1.1.9	
 	SVGA Display, XGA Recommended	 	 	 	R.3.1.1.10	
 	Parallel Port for Copy Protection Module	 	 	 	R.3.1.1.11	
 	Two RS 232 Serial Ports	 	 	 	R.3.1.1.12	
     b. TOM Compliant 	 	 	 	 	R.3.1.1.13	
          Equiv. Nokia Mobile Telephone	 	 	 	 	R.3.1.1.14	
     c. Multi DMAC Unit Called MUD	 	 	 	 	R.3.1.1.15	
     d. PCMCIA Adapter Card	 	 	 	 	R.3.1.1.16	
     e. GPS Receiver	(Centennial PCMCIA Satriav (NMEA 0183)	 	 	 	R.3.1.1.17	
 	and GPS Antenna Unit) or Garmin GPS II /	 	 	 	R.3.1.1.18	
 	Garmin GPS II Plus/ Garmin GPS III /III Plus/	 	 	 	R.3.1.1.19	
 	Garmin GPS 35/(Rockwell NavCard LP PCMCIA	 	 	 	R.3.1.1.20	
 	(NMEA 0183)  and GP anlenna Unit / Trimble	 	 	 	R.3.1.1.21	
 	Placer 450/455(TAIP) and GPS antenna Unit)/	 	 	 	R.3.1.1.22	
 	(Trimble Scout Master(NMEA m0183) nd GPS 	 	 	 	R.3.1.1.23	
 	antenna Unit)/(Most Other GPS Receivers with 	 	 	 	R.3.1.1.24	
 	NMEA 0183 Compatible Output)	 	 	 	R.3.1.1.25	
     f. Fast Frequency Scanner	GSM 900 Scanner (Channels:1-124)	 	 	 	R.3.1.1.26	
 	GSM 1800 Scanner (Channels:512-885)	 	 	 	R.3.1.1.27	
 	GSM 900/1800 Scanner (Channels 1-124,512-885)	 	 	 	R.3.1.1.28	
 	PCS 1900 Scanner (Channels 512-810)	 	 	 	R.3.1.1.29	
    g. Software for Analyzing Measurements	PC with a Pentium III Processor, 500MHz	 	 	 	R.3.1.1.30	
         Equiv. SAM Version 3:0)	SVGA Display (Monitor)	 	 	 	R.3.1.1.31	
 	128 MB of RAM (256 MB recommended)	 	 	 	R.3.1.1.32	
 	20 GB Hard disk Drive Recommended	 	 	 	R.3.1.1.33	
 	CD-ROM Drive for Installation	 	 	 	R.3.1.1.34	
 	Microsoft® Windows® 95, Windows® 98	 	 	 	R.3.1.1.35	
 	or Windows NT® 3.51 or Higher	 	 	 	R.3.1.1.36	
 	Microsoft® Excel Installation	 	 	 	R.3.1.1.37	
2. Cellular Network Planning Based PC	 	1	3,000.00	3,000.00	R.3.1.2.1	
        Consist of :	 	 	 	 	R.3.1.2.2	
 a. IBM PC - Caompatible Computer	A windows NT® Operating System	 	 	 	R.3.1.2.3	
 	PC with a Pentium III Processor, 500MHz	 	 	 	R.3.1.2.4	
 	SVGA Display (Monitor)	 	 	 	R.3.1.2.5	
 	128 MB of RAM (256 MB recommended)	 	 	 	R.3.1.2.6	
 	40 GB Hardisk of RAM (256 MB Recommended)	 	 	 	R.3.1.2.7	
 	CD-ROM Drive for Installation	 	 	 	R.3.1.2.8	
 b. Software of Cellular Network Planning	Equiv. Nokia Network Planning System NPS/X tools)	 	 	 	R.3.1.2.9	
 c. Map of Macassar City and Surrounding	Size 20 KM by 25 Km  Installed to PC	 	 	 	R.3.1.2.10	
     Regency wiyh the area 	 	 	 	 	R.3.1.2.11	
3. DS-SS CDMA Training System II 	Equiv.  ED - 2940	1	11,213.00	11,213.00	R.3.1.3	
4. 3HU Sweep Function Generator 2 MHz	Equiv. 725501 Leybold	1	1,475.83	1,475.83	R.3.1.4	
	TOTAL		$	85,931.10		

Appendix – 8
Detailed Specifications : Program Development - year 3			
Name of Program	Quantity 	Unit Cost	Total	
 	 	 	 	
R.2.1. Apprenticeship Programs in Industry	1 month, 17 persons	542,986.43	9,230,769.24	
R.2.2 .Workshop on Curriculum Development with Industrial Participation	4 days,  25 persons	131,538.47	13,153,846.50	
R.2.3. Industrial Training and Studies Programs Development	9 days	370,370.37	3,333,333.33	
R.4.1 Students’ English Technical Writing and Conversational Skills Development	5 days, 20 persons	20,857.14	2,085,714.29	
R.4.2.Students’ Computer and Internet Skills Development	12 days	833,333.33	10,000,000.00	
R.4.4.Students’ Personality and Entrepreneurship Development	9 days	759,682.54	6,837,142.86	
A.2 5.Learning Skills Training Program	2 days, 40 persons	125,000.00	10,000,000.00	
E.1.2/E.1.3.Teaching Improvement Workshops	2 days, 40 persons	125,000.00	7,649,193.78	
		Total Cost:	62,290,000.00	

Appendix – 9
Detailed Specifications : Instructional Materials ( year 3 )						
Type of Instructional	Technical/bidding	Qty	Unit 	Utilities	Estimated 	Remark	
Materials	specification	 	Cost	 	Cost	 	
 	C++ for Programmer,2/e	2	42.95	 	85.90	 	
 	C++ Effective Object -Oriented Software Constructions	2	49.99	 	99.98	 	
 	Building Electronic Commerce With Web-Driven Database	2	85	 	170.00	 	
 	Communications Technologies	2	46.67	 	93.34	 	
 	Data Base Systems Using Oracle : A Simplified to SQL and PL/SQL	2	53.27	 	106.54	 	
 	Developing Distributed and E-Commerce Applications	2	50.99	 	101.98	 	
 	Distributed Database Systems	2	48.99	 	97.98	 	
 	Electronic Commerce	2	60	 	120.00	 	
 	Internetworking with TCP/IP Vol.III	2	68	 	136.00	 	
 	Linux Firewalls, 2/e	2	44.99	 	89.98	 	
 	Linux TCP/IP Network  Administration	2	44.99	 	89.98	 	
 	Local and Metropolitan Area Networks 6/e	2	82	 	164.00	 	
 	MySQL Building User Interface	2	49.99	 	99.98	 	
 	TCP/IP 2/e	2	56.5	 	113.00	 	
 	Data Structures in C++	2	80	 	160.00	 	
 	Data Structures in Java	3	73	 	219.00	 	
 	E-Commerce : Business, Techlogy, Society	2	82.67	 	165.34	 	
 	IBM PC Assembly Language and Programming 5/e	2	73	 	146.00	 	
 	Multimedia lnformation Networking	2	106	 	212.00	 	
 	Telecommunications  for Managers 5/e	2	104	 	208.00	 	
 	The Linus A - Z 	5	42.99	 	214.95	 	
 	The Object Of Java	2	68	 	136.00	 	
 	Structured C for Engineeringand Technology 4/e	2	85	 	170.00	 	
 	Synergy Hardware Software	2	37.95	 	75.90	 	
 	System Analysis and Design 5/e	2	90.67	 	181.34	 	
 	The Art of Electronics	2	70	 	140.00	 	
 	The Essential Guide to Telecommunications	3	27.99	 	83.97	 	
 	Security Analysis	2	40	 	80.00	 	
 	Physics for Scientists and Engineers : Volume II Electricity 	2	48.95	 	97.90	 	
 	magnetism and Light	 	 	 	0.00	 	
 	Basic Electric Circuit Analysis: Student Problem Set With Solutions	2	31.75	 	63.50	 	
 	Powering the Future: The Ballard Fuel Cell and The race to changes	2	17.95	 	35.90	 	
 	the world	 	 	 	0.00	 	
 	The Electrical Power Engineering Handbook	2	103.96	 	207.92	 	
 	Field and Wave Electromagnetics	2	102	 	204.00	 	
 	Teach Yourself  Electricity and Electronics	2	27.96	 	55.92	 	
 	Fiber Optics Technician's Manual	2	46.95	 	93.90	 	
 	Basic Electronic	2	76.5	 	153.00	 	
 	Protective Relaying : Principles and Applications	2	59.75	 	119.50	 	
 	Small Electric Motors : Use,Selection,Operation,Repair, and	2	24	 	48.00	 	
 	Maintenance	 	 	 	 	 	
 	Introduction Fiber Otics	3	32.95	 	98.85	 	
 	Switch Engineering Handbook 	2	64.5	 	129.00	 	
 	Power Generation Handbook	2	99.95	 	199.90	 	
 	Antenna Theory : Analysis and Design	2	111.75	 	223.50	 	
 	Protective Relaying Theory and Applications	2	99.75	 	199.50	 	
 	Data Communications 3/e : From Basic to Broadband	2	55	 	110.00	 	
 	Data Communications for Engineers	2	44.99	 	89.98	 	
 	Data Communications Computer Networks And Open System4/e	2	44.95	 	89.90	 	
 	Multimedia Communications : Applications Networks, Protocol	2	50.99	 	101.98	 	
 	and Standard	 	 	 	 	 	
 	MySQL and Perl for the Web	2	44.99	 	89.98	 	
 	Fundementals of Convolutional Coding                                     	2	72.95	 	145.90	 	
 	Electricity and Electronics Interactve Software Site License	2	300	 	600.00	 	
 	Industrial and Commersial Power System Handbook	2	69.65	 	139.30	 	
 	The Electric Power Engineering Handbook	2	139.95	 	279.90	 	
 	Power Quality Solutions : Case Studies for Troubleshooters	2	82	 	164.00	 	
 	Power System Stability and Control	2	95	 	190.00	 	
 	Energy efficient Transformers	2	59.95	 	119.90	 	
 	Analysis of Multiconductor Transmissions Line	2	149.5	 	299.00	 	
 	Digital Modulation techniques	3	102	 	306.00	 	
 	Geographic Information System : A Management Perspective	2	48.95	 	97.90	 	
 	Computer Processing of Remotely Sensed Images	2	59.95	 	119.90	 	
 	Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis : An Introduction	2	43.95	 	87.90	 	
 	Geographic Information System : An Introduction	2	49.95	 	99.90	 	
 	Remote sensing : The Quantitative Approach	2	35.45	 	70.90	 	
 	Digital Signa Processing : Principle, Algorithm and Application	2	102.95	 	205.90	 	
 	Signal and Linier System	2	92	 	184.00	 	
 	Signal and Noise in Communication System	2	42.95	 	85.90	 	
 	Voice and Speech Processing	2	36.95	 	73.90	 	
 	Numerical Methods for Computer Science, Engineering and 	2	36.5	 	73.00	 	
 	mathematics	 	 	 	 	 	
Journal 	IEEE Power Engineering, etc	1	250.00	 	250.00	 	
Journal 	IEEE Telecommunication Engineering, etc	1	250.00	 	250.00	 	
Journal 	IEEE Control Engineering, etc	1	250.00	 	250.00	 	
 	Total Cost:	10,266.49	 	

Appendix-10					
Detailed Specifications : Consultants Services - Internasional ( year 3 )	
Qualification	Major Assignment	Estimated length of visit ( month )	Estimated Cost	Major field	
N/A	 	 	 	 	

Appendix - 11					
Detailed Specifications : Consultants Services - Domestic ( year 1 to year 4 )	
Qualification	Major Assignment	Estimated length of visit ( month )	Estimated Cost	Major field	
N/A	 	 	 	 	

Appendix – 12
Detailed Specifications : Project Management - Operational Support – year 3			
Activities	Purpose	Scope	Quantity	Unit Cost	Estimated Cost	
Telephone (LS)	 	 	12	1,000,000.00	12,000,000.00	
Couries Services (LS)	 	 	1	2,000,000.00	2,000,000.00	
Regular Meetings (LS)	 	 	1	6,000,000.00	6,000,000.00	
Tender committee (LS)	 	 	1	6,000,000.00	6,000,000.00	
Copy and Printing (LS)	 	 	1	4,000,000.00	4,000,000.00	
				Total Cost:	30,000,000.00	

Appendix - 13
Detailed Specifications : Project Management - O & M of Facilities - year 3 				
Program/Activities	Purpose	Description/Scope	Quantity	Unit Cost	Estimated Cost	
Laboratory	Consumable Requirement	Precurement of 	1	19,938,904.50	19,938,904.50	
 	 	consumable material	 	0.00	0.00	
 	 	for 4 years	 	0.00	0.00	
Administration Support Operational & Maintenance	For Office and Laboratories 	O & M laboratory, 	1	19,039,212.00	19,039,212.00	
 	activities to support operational 	teaching and office equipment 	 	0.00	 	
				Total Cost :	38,978,116.50	

Appendix - 14
Detailed Specifications : Project Management - Sub-Project Management Unit Operation - year 3 	
Program/Activities	Number Person	Duration 	Quantity	Unit Cost	Estimated Cost	
 	 Involved	 	 	 	 	
Coordinator Project	1	12	12	675,000.00	8,100,000.00	
Secretary project	1	12	12	540,000.00	6,480,000.00	
Person in charge	11	7	77	405,000.00	31,185,000.00	
Additional support staff	4	10.5	42	135,000.00	5,670,000.00	
Consumables (LS)	1	1	1	23,232,000.00	23,232,000.00	
Tender committee	1	1	1	1,500,000.00	1,500,000.00	
expenses per-program	 	 	 	0.00	 	
Travel allowance	2	3	6	3,100,500.00	18,603,000.00	
( per-trip)	 	 	 	 	 	
				Total Cost:	94,770,000.00